Research Paper

Discuss and Critique a Quantitative Research Study [WLOs: 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 2, 4]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site., and the article by Henrich et al. titled Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.. Also review Standard 8 of the APA Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of ConductLinks to an external site. from last week.

Your instructor will post an announcement with the reference for the quantitative research study you will discuss and critique in this discussion. The study will be found in the UAGC Library. Refer to the Library resource How Do I Find An Article When I Have A Citation?Links to an external site. if you need help finding the article.

In your initial post, consider the following:

  • Compare and contrast the characteristics of experimental and nonexperimental quantitative research.
  • State the research question the researchers were trying to answer in the study.
  • Identify the type of quantitative research design that was used in the assigned study.
  • Evaluate whether the researchers’ conclusion follows logically from the evidence presented.
  • Identify threats to internal and external validity that might apply to how this study was conducted.
  • Determine whether validity threats were addressed by the researchers. If so, describe how this was done.
  • Summarize ethical considerations that were mentioned in the research report.
  • Assess what ethical considerations apply to the design of the study but that were not mentioned by the researchers.
  • Explain how you might do a study on this topic differently and why your approach would be more appropriate than the one used by the researchers.
  • Evaluate whether a quantitative approach would be useful for the research topic you chose in Week 1.
  • Describe the actions you would take to ensure that a quantitative study on your topic would be ethical.
  • Support your evaluation of the study with citations and references of the required readings and other peer-reviewed sources. Refer to the Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. tip sheet to help determine which sources are appropriate.
Read More
Research Paper

Design a Quantitative Study [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 5]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to an external site., and the article by Henrich et al. titled Most People Are Not WEIRDLinks to an external site.. Also review Standard 8 of the APA Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of ConductLinks to an external site. from last week. Your instructor will post an announcement with the assigned research question. You and your colleagues will share ideas about how to research this topic using a quantitative approach.

In your initial post, consider the following guidelines and questions:

  • Apply the scientific method by developing a null and an alternative hypothesis that provide potential answers to the research question.
  • Review the quantitative research designs in the required readings and choose one that is suitable for your research question and hypotheses. Explain why this choice is most appropriate to test your hypotheses.
  • Describe the target population, the desired sample, and any cultural considerations that may be involved.
  • Identify potential internal and external threats to validity. Explain how you might mitigate these threats.
  • Determine ethical issues that would need to be addressed. Explain what you would do to ensure an ethical study.
Read More
Research Paper

Practical Theology: The Wonder of God Assignment Instructions

Overview

Theology is never developed or expressed in a vacuum, either personally or practically. In order to move you from Biblical Theology (getting it from the right source) to Systematic Theology (getting it straight) to Practical Theology (living it out), there needs to be a certain flexibility of application based on your personal calling and goals as a Christian leader. Therefore, you will have the chance to choose what fits your current or future ministry needs best with this assignment (and the second one just like it later in the course). For instance, if Christ has called you to a teaching or preaching ministry, then the Curriculum or Sermon Projects below might prove most helpful to you as you prepare to integrate what you are learning theologically into your ministry context. On the other hand, if you are pursuing education to serve Christ’s kingdom as a Christian counselor, then you should choose the Biblical Counseling Project. We want this assignment to be as helpful and applicable as possible for you as you seek to be equipped to work in a specific ministry context. For this first practical theology assignment, you will focus your work only on The Wonder of God (Theology Proper: Divine Attributes and Personal Discipleship).

Instructions

Complete a theological reflection and application assignment related to ONE of the following options in reference to the Wonder of God:

  1. Curriculum Project

            You may develop a course related to The Wonder of God (Theology Proper: Divine    Attributes and Personal Discipleship). This may be particularly beneficial to those who       are involved in active ministry, for your materials may be directly suited to your own             ministry needs. The project should make use of class notes, textbooks, other readings,       and any other information you may wish to include. However, it must be your own          arrangement of the materials in your own words. The curriculum must be appropriate for             the target audience. You are encouraged to include audiovisual aids, but these are not    required. You must support your curriculum with at least 3 scriptural passages as well as          with course/outside texts that properly address the topic from a conservative evangelical point of view. This assignment must be 2,500 – 3,000 words, be original work, be in         current Turabian format, and use footnotes where needed.

  1. Thought Journal

            Thought journals are an excellent way to force oneself to ponder issues and interact with           ideas over time. In this assignment option, you will complete an indefinite number of    journal entries throughout the first 4 weeks of the course related to The Wonder of God             (Theology Proper: Divine Attributes and Personal Discipleship). Each entry will            consist of a single page, double spaced, typed, and should meet several criteria: Each           journal entry should deal with a topic relevant to The Wonder of God (Theology             Proper: Divine Attributes and Personal Discipleship), should demonstrate personal interaction with the issues involved, and should demonstrate a depth of thinking and clarity of expression.

Beyond these criteria, you are encouraged to exercise creativity in writing the journals.  Some entries may critically analyze an issue from a given discussion or from the textbooks. Others may consist of book reviews or even film reviews that are relevant to The Wonder of God (Theology Proper: Divine Attributes and Personal Discipleship). You must support at least three of your thought journals with scriptural passages as well as with course/outside texts that properly address the issue from a conservative evangelical point of view. Use of outside sources is not required for all your journals entries but is strongly encouraged for at least some of the journal entries. This assignment must be 2,500 – 3,000 words, be original work, be in current Turabian format, and use footnotes where needed.

  1. Sermon Project

            With this option, you will produce two sermons focused on The Wonder of God         (Theology Proper: Divine Attributes and Personal Discipleship). In other words, one             can use this as an opportunity to preach about the divine attributes of God. These sermons             need to be full transcripts of a 20–30-minute sermon (about five pages per sermon        double spaced), and they need to include an introductory paragraph with a description of the       target audience (Senior Adults, Young Adults, Youth, etc.). You must support your             sermons with at least 3 scriptural passages as well as with course/outside texts that         properly address the topic from a conservative evangelical point of view. This assignment      must be 2,500 – 3,000 words, be original work, be in current Turabian format, and use            footnotes where needed.

  1. Biblical Counseling Project

            If you choose this option they will produce a number of biblical response papers to be used in personal counseling sessions. These Bible studies must all integrate theological truths related to The Wonder of God (Theology Proper: Divine Attributes and      Personal Discipleship). Each response should be about two pages double spaced and      relate to specific felt needs that might be addressed in your future ministry as a biblical   counselor (abuse, addiction, anger, depression, divorce, grief, illness, etc.). These two-         page papers would be handed to the counselee and worked through during a counseling             session. You must support each of your biblical response papers with at least 3 scriptural          passages as well as with course/outside texts that properly address the issue from a   conservative evangelical point of view. This assignment must be 2,500 – 3,000 words, be             original work, be in current Turabian format, and use footnotes where needed.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Read More
Research Paper

Disciple Making Plan: Part 1 – Foundations Assignment Instructions

For the foundation you will create a detailed explanation of your personal plan to develop disciples for Jesus Christ within a ministry context. Must include a bibliography with a minimum of 5 scholarly sources, which can include the course textbooks. To develop your plan, thoroughly cover the first 3 P’s of ministry planning:

  1. Passages—What are the main discipleship passages that guide your ministry? Who are you focusing on? What regions, demographics, groups, ages, etc., are you to aiming to reach and disciple? (2 pages)
  2. Principles—What are your core values in ministry? What passages and principles are you basing your plan upon? How do these passages apply? Try to simplify to 3 statements. (1 page)
  3. Philosophy—What are your most important ministry perspectives? What are your definitions for key terms within your ministry? (2 pages) Examples include:
    1. Give a detailed description of how disciples are
      made in the context of a healthy church and a Christian community. \
    1. Give an overview of the body of Christ and discuss what the model of your
      church is based upon the TAHO chart.
    1. Assess your church or ministry based on the healthy church assessment and
      identify the strong and weak areas with suggestions on how to improve.
    1. Detail the role and importance of the local church, pastor, saints, and spiritual
      gifts in God’s plan for being and making disciples, using Scripture and other
      scholarly sources to support your arguments.

Note that your plan must include a table of contents and bibliography; this will not contribute to the overall page count. Current Turabian format must be used. It is strongly recommended that you refer to the lecture notes in the course as you develop your Disciple Making Plan.

Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module 4: Week 4.

Read More
Research Paper

Discuss and Critique a Qualitative Research Study [WLOs: 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 2, 4]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the qualitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 9 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the article by Bieler et al. titled Distributing Reflexivity Through Co-laborative EthnographyLinks to an external site., the article by Morgan et al. titled Case Study Observational Research: A Framework for Conducting Case Study Research Where Observation Data Are the FocusLinks to an external site., the article by Spector-Mersel & Knaifel titled Narrative Research on Mental Health Recovery: Two Sister ParadigmsLinks to an external site., and the article by Urcia titled Comparisons of Adaptations in Grounded Theory and Phenomenology: Selecting the Specific Qualitative Research MethodologyLinks to an external site.. Also review Standard 8 of the APA Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of ConductLinks to an external site. from Week 1. Your instructor will post an announcement with the reference for the qualitative research study you will discuss and critique in this discussion. The study will be found in the UAGC Library. Refer to the Library resource How Do I Find an Article When I Have a Citation?Links to an external site. if you need help finding the article. 

In your initial post, consider the following:
•    What is the research question? How does a qualitative research question differ from the research question in a quantitative study?
•    What procedure was used to recruit participants for the sample? Was the sample size appropriate? Why or why not?
•    What do you think the researcher’s paradigm was?
•    What evidence of reflexivity do you see in the research report?
•    What ethical considerations were mentioned in the research report? What applicable ethical considerations can you think of that were not mentioned by the researchers?
•    How might a qualitative approach be useful for the research topic you chose in Week 1?

Read More