Research Paper

Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

Consider what you have learned through your previous practicum experiences and use the balance of your practicum hours to discuss with your classroom teacher the elements of your personal learning philosophy.

Use the “Learning Philosophy Template” as a resource to guide the writing of your personal learning philosophy essay.

In a 1,000-1,250-word personal learning philosophy essay, include the following: Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

  1. The nature versus nurture concept and debate.
  2. What it means to be an early childhood professional.
  3. The role of the early childhood educator as a professional when working with learners, families, and colleagues. Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy
  4. The role of the early childhood educator as advocate on behalf of children.
  5. Your methods for assessing student understanding for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children, including your views on the statement “all children can learn” and key assessment practices.
  6. The role of technology in the education of young children.
  7. The importance of environment to teaching and learning for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children.

Use course readings on particular theories, as well as 3-5 scholarly articles that can be used in support of your personal learning philosophy.

Prepare this assignment according to the GCU guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

2attachments

Slide 1 of 2

  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_1attachment_1open in full 24px minthumb 20191004105949bench mark rubric page 0
  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_2attachment_2open in full 24px min

ECH-125Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

Benchmark Assignment and Rubric

Assignment Instructions:

Consider what you have learned through your previous practicum experiences and use the balance of your practicum hours todiscuss with your classroom teacher the elements of your personal learning philosophy.

Use the “Learning Philosophy Template” as a resource to guide the writing of your personal learning philosophy essay.

In a 1,000-1,250-word personal learning philosophy essay, include the following:

  1. The nature versus nurture concept and debate.
  2. What it means to be an early childhood professional.
  3. The role of the early childhood educator as a professional when working with learners, families, and colleagues.
  4. The role of the early childhood educator as advocate on behalf of children.
  5. Your methods for assessing student understanding for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children, including your views on the statement “all children can learn” and key assessment practices.
  6. The role of technology in the education of young children.
  7. The importance of environment to teaching and learning for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children.

Use course readings on particular theories, as well as 3-5 scholarly articles that can be used in support of your personal learning philosophy.

Prepare this assignment according to the GCU guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Document the hours and locations that you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.

Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form by the end of the course. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.

Standards/Competencies Assessed:

Standards and program competencies assessed in the benchmark assignment: Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

  • NAEYC: 4a, 6a, 6c
  • InTASC: 3a,9a, 10f
  • COE Program Competencies:

3.5:    Collaborate with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children. (NAEYC 4a; InTASC 3a). Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

4.1:    Engage in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes. (NAEYC 6a, 6c; InTASC 9a, 10f)

Scoring Rubric

Criteria% Value1: Unsatisfactory2: Less Than Satisfactory3: Satisfactory4: Good5: Excellent
% Scaling 0%65%75%80%100%
Content – 77%
Nature versus Nurture  11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear.Philosophical view is provided with clear, theoretical, and scholarly support.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support.
Early Childhood Professional NAEYC: 6a, 6cInTASC: 9a, 10fCOE:11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes, but is unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes that is realistic.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes that is realistic and insightful.
Role with Learners, Families, and Colleagues NAEYC:4aInTASC:3aCOE: 3.511%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children, but is unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children that is realistic.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children that is realistic and insightful.
Role as Advocate  11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include how advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood profession.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis realistic.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis realistic and insightful.
Methods For Assessing Student Understanding11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices. Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning PhilosophyPhilosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Does not include all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.
Role of Technology11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include a perspective with young children.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Does not include a perspective with young children.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with young children.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with young children.
Importance of Environment to Teaching and Learning11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support.Does not include a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support.Includes a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with both age groups.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format – 23%
Thesis Development and Purpose5%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper.It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper.Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Paragraph Development and Transitions5%Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence.No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent.Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions.Ideas progress and relate to each other.Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.Paragraph structure is seamless.
Mechanics of Writing(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Writing is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 
Paper Format
(1- inch margins;
12-point-font;
double-spaced;
Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)
4%GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. 
Research Citations
(In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
4%No reference page is included. No citations are used.Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

ECH-125Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy

Benchmark Assignment and Rubric

Assignment Instructions:

Consider what you have learned through your previous practicum experiences and use the balance of your practicum hours todiscuss with your classroom teacher the elements of your personal learning philosophy.

Use the “Learning Philosophy Template” as a resource to guide the writing of your personal learning philosophy essay.

In a 1,000-1,250-word personal learning philosophy essay, include the following:

  1. The nature versus nurture concept and debate.
  2. What it means to be an early childhood professional.
  3. The role of the early childhood educator as a professional when working with learners, families, and colleagues.
  4. The role of the early childhood educator as advocate on behalf of children.
  5. Your methods for assessing student understanding for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children, including your views on the statement “all children can learn” and key assessment practices.
  6. The role of technology in the education of young children.
  7. The importance of environment to teaching and learning for Birth to Age 5/Pre-K and K to Age 8/Grade 3 children.

Use course readings on particular theories, as well as 3-5 scholarly articles that can be used in support of your personal learning philosophy.

Prepare this assignment according to the GCU guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Document the hours and locations that you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.

Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form by the end of the course. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.

Standards/Competencies Assessed:

Standards and program competencies assessed in the benchmark assignment:

  • NAEYC: 4a, 6a, 6c
  • InTASC: 3a,9a, 10f
  • COE Program Competencies:

3.5:    Collaborate with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children. (NAEYC 4a; InTASC 3a)

4.1:    Engage in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes. (NAEYC 6a, 6c; InTASC 9a, 10f)

Scoring Rubric

Criteria% Value1: Unsatisfactory2: Less Than Satisfactory3: Satisfactory4: Good5: Excellent
% Scaling 0%65%75%80%100%
Content – 77%
Nature versus Nurture  11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear.Philosophical view is provided with clear, theoretical, and scholarly support.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support.
Early Childhood Professional NAEYC: 6a, 6cInTASC: 9a, 10fCOE:11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes, but is unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes that is realistic.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes engaging in ongoing, collaborative professional development from the early childhood field to inform practice in order to maximize learning outcomes that is realistic and insightful.
Role with Learners, Families, and Colleagues NAEYC:4aInTASC:3aCOE: 3.511%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children, but is unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children that is realistic.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes collaboration with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning environment of openness, mutual respect, positive relationships, and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children that is realistic and insightful.
Role as Advocate  11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include how advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood profession.Philosophical view is provided with references to theories and scholarly support, but the connection is unclear. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis unrealistic.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis realistic.Philosophical view provides a unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. How advocacy can promote learning opportunities, strengthen the learning environment, and advance the early childhood professionis realistic and insightful.
Methods For Assessing Student Understanding11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Does not include all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes all of the following: Both age groups, opinion on given statement, and key assessment practices.
Role of Technology11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include a perspective with young children.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Does not include a perspective with young children. Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning PhilosophyPhilosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with young children.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with young children.
Importance of Environment to Teaching and Learning11%No submission.Philosophical view is provided, but theoretical or scholarly support is not given. Does not include a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support.Does not include a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view is provided with clear theoretical and scholarly support.Includes a perspective with both age groups.Philosophical view providesa unique perspective with theoretical and scholarly support. Includes a perspective with both age groups.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format – 23%
Thesis Development and Purpose5%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper.It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper.Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Paragraph Development and Transitions5%Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence.No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent.Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions.Ideas progress and relate to each other.Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.Paragraph structure is seamless.
Mechanics of Writing(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Writing is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 
Paper Format
(1- inch margins;
12-point-font;
double-spaced;
Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)
4%GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Benchmark – Developing a Personal Learning Philosophy GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. 
Research Citations
(In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
4%No reference page is included. No citations are used.Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Read More
Research Paper

Assignment: Benchmark – ELA Unit Plan

Special educators must be able to effectively plan for students at all ages and abilities, using data and anecdotal information. An effective plan takes into consideration a student’s developmental level, age, strengths, needs, learning preferences, culture, and interests. Interventions that are well planned for students and are based on these factors are far more effective than interventions that narrowly focus only on the student’s academic skill deficiencies. Assignment: Benchmark – ELA Unit Plan

In this assignment, practice developing ELA instruction that is appropriate for the students described in the “Class Profile” by designing a comprehensive ELA unit plan using the “5-Day Unit Plan Template.”

Part 1: Unit Plan

Develop a 5-day unit plan that integrates vocabulary, reading, grammar, writing, listening and speaking, and technology, for the “Class Profile” students, choosing either the resource or self-contained learning environment. In a typical resource or self-contained learning environment the teacher would differentiate for every student. For this assignment, choose three students for whom you will differentiate the instruction. Align your unit to a 6-12 grade level ELA standard from the Arizona or another state academic content standards.

Design the unit plan to include:

  • National/State Learning Standards: Select standards that address reading, writing, speaking, and listening integration skills.
  • Multiple Means of Representation: Select strategies that allow opportunities to develop oral and written language for students with disabilities. Incorporate individual abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the section.
  • Multiple Means of Engagement: Select strategies to enhance language development and communication skills.
  • Multiple Means of Expression: Use technically sound formal and informal assessment.
  • Extension Activity and/or Homework: Incorporate activities that include critical thinking and problem-solving.
  • In the Differentiation rows of the unit plan template focus on the three students you selected.

Part 2: Rationale

In 250-500 words rationale at the bottom of your unit plan, explain the following:

  • How literacy skills from your lesson plan will be helpful for students in other content areas.
  • How communication and language arts strategies prepare students and provide them strategies to be successful academically and personally across multiple settings with a variety of collaborators (e.g., individuals, families, and teams).

Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

College of Education (COE) program competencies and national standards assessed in the benchmark assignment:

COE 4.1:

Select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias. [CEC 4.1, ICSI.4.K1, ICSI.4.K2, ICSI.4.K4. ICSI.4.S1, ICSI.4.S5, ICSI.4.S8, IGC.4.K1, IGC.4.S1, IGC.4.S2, IGC.4.S3, IGC.4.S4, IGC.5.S13; InTASC 6(a), 6(b), 6(h), 6(j), 6(k); GCU Mission Critical 2, 3, 5]

COE 5.1:

Consider individual abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the selection, development, and adaptation of learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.1, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S15, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 1(b), 2(d), 5(f), 6(v), 8(s), 9(h); GCU Mission Critical 2, 3, 4, 5]

COE 5.4:

Use strategies to enhance language development and communication skills of individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.4, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.S13, IGC.5.S14, IGC.5.S16, IGC.5.S17, IGC.5.S18, IGC.5.S19, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 2(e); GCU Mission Critical 1, 4]

COE 5.5:

Develop and implement a variety of education and transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and different learning experiences in collaboration with individuals, families, and teams. [CEC 5.5, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S15ICSI.5.S17, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.K3, IGC.5.K8, IGC.5.S1, IGC.5.S2, IGC.5.S11 IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 7(b), 7(e); GCU Mission Critical 1, 2, 4, 5]

COE 5.7:

Teach cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills such as critical thinking and problem solving to individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.7, ICSI.5.S14, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S16, IGC.5.S3, IGC.5.S10; InTASC 5(a), 7(h); GCU Mission Critical 1, 2, 4]

2attachments

Slide 1 of 2

  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_1attachment_1open in full 24px minthumb 201908150035015 day lesson plan page 0
  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_2attachment_2open in full 24px min
Read More
Research Paper

ELM 480 English Language Arts Lesson Preparation & Morning Routine Paper

Planning effective English language arts lessons many times includes focusing on multiple literacy skills, aligned to state or national standards, while incorporating interesting, student-centered materials. When focusing on reading, it is essential to model metacognitive strategies, before, during, and after reading, including relevant vocabulary. A book walk is a powerful pre-reading strategy that can be used at all elementary grade levels. This strategy exposes students to a new piece of literary or informative text, while predicting text content and exploring vocabulary.

Throughout this course you will be creating a literature unit based on one piece of grade-appropriate literature (fiction or non-fiction) that includes all areas of reading development. Select a piece of literature suitable for the students in the “Class Profile.” ELM 480 English Language Arts Lesson Preparation & Morning Routine Paper

For this assignment, use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a lesson plan that incorporates a book walk,

Incorporate the following into your lesson plan:

  • Objectives aligned to state or national grade-appropriate vocabulary and reading standards
  • Content-specific vocabulary development
  • Technology or multimedia that supports developmentally appropriate, engaging instruction
  • Pre-reading strategies and activities
  • During reading strategies and activities
  • Post-reading activities and strategies
  • Assessment aligned to learning objectives, that is engaging for student and provides meaningful feedback
  • Differentiation to meet particular learning differences or needs

In addition, rationalize your instructional choices in a 250-500 word reflection, including how you will apply your findings to personal professional practices related to instruction and differentiation in the English language arts classroom. I have included the lesson plan template and the class profile. ***** The target grade is First grade*****

2attachments

Slide 1 of 2

  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_1attachment_1open in full 24px minthumb 20200624220639elm 480 t7 class profile 2 page 0
  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_2attachment_2open in full 24px min

Section 1: Lesson Preparation

Teacher Candidate Name:   
Grade Level:   
Date:  
Unit/Subject:  
Instructional Plan Title:  
Lesson Summary and Focus:In 2-3 sentences, summarize the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching. 
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping:Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.    
National/State Learning Standards:Review national and state standards to become familiar with the standards you will be working with in the classroom environment.Your goal in this section is to identify the standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented. Standards must address learning initiatives from one or more content areas, as well as align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments.Include the standards with the performance indicators and the standard language in its entirety.      
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives:Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards. When creating objectives, a learner must consider the following:Who is the audienceWhat action verb will be measured during instruction/assessmentWhat tools or conditions are being used to meet the learning What is being assessed in the lesson must align directly to the objective created. This should not be a summary of the lesson, but a measurable statement demonstrating what the student will be assessed on at the completion of the lesson. For instance, “understand” is not measureable, but “describe” and “identify” are.For example:Given an unlabeled map outlining the 50 states, students will accurately label all state names.  
Academic LanguageIn this section, include a bulleted list of the general academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary you need to teach. In a few sentences, describe how you will teach students those terms in the lesson.        
Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology:List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology you and the students will use during the lesson. As required by your instructor, add or attach copies of ALL printed and online materials at the end of this template. Include links needed for online resources.         

Section 2: Instructional Planning

Anticipatory SetYour goal in this section is to open the lesson by activating students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson and gaining student interest for the lesson. Consider various learning preferences (movement, music, visuals) as a tool to engage interest and motivate learners for the lesson.In a bulleted list, describe the materials and activities you will use to open the lesson. Bold any materials you will need to prepare for the lesson. For example:·         I will use a visual of the planet Earthand ask students to describe what Earth looks like.·         I will record their ideas on the white board and ask more questions about the amount of water they think is on planet Earth and where the water is located. Time Needed
Multiple Means of RepresentationLearners perceive and comprehend information differently. Your goal in this section is to explain how you would present content in various ways to meet the needs of different learners. For example, you may present the material using guided notes, graphic organizers, video or other visual media, annotation tools, anchor charts, hands-on manipulatives, adaptive technologies, etc.In a bulleted list, describe the materials you will use to differentiate instruction and how you will use these materials throughout the lesson to support learning. Bold any materials you will need to prepare for the lesson. For example:·         I will use a Venn diagram graphic organizer to teach students how to compare and contrast the two main characters in the read-aloud story.·         I will model one example on the white board before allowing students to work on the Venn diagram graphic organizer with their elbow partner.           Explain how you will differentiate materials for each of the following groups: ·         English language learners (ELL):   ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
Multiple Means of EngagementIn a bulleted list, describe the activities you will engage students in to allow them to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language. Bold any activities you will use in the lesson. Also, include formative questioning strategies and higher order thinking questions you might pose. For example:·         I will use a matching card activity where students will need to find a partner with a card that has an answer that matches their number sentence. ·         I will model one example of solving a number sentence on the white board before having students search for the matching card.·         I will then have the partner who has the number sentence explain to their partner how they got the answer.        Explain how you will differentiate activities for each of the following groups:·         English language learners (ELL):   ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
Multiple Means of ExpressionLearners differ in the ways they navigate a learning environment and express what they know. Your goal in this section is to explain the various ways in which your students will demonstrate what they have learned. Explain how you will provide alternative means for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all learners. Will you tier any of these products? Will you offer students choicesto demonstrate mastery? This section is essentially differentiated assessment.In a bulleted list, explain the options you willprovide for your students to express their knowledge about the topic. For example, students may demonstrate their knowledge in more summative ways through a short answer or multiple-choice test, multimedia presentation, video, speech to text, website, written sentence, paragraph, essay, poster, portfolio, hands-on project, experiment, reflection, blog post, or skit. Bold the names of any summative assessments.Students may also demonstrate their knowledge in ways that are more formative. For example, students may take part in thumbs up-thumbs middle-thumbs down, a short essay or drawing, an entrance slip or exit ticket, mini-whiteboard answers, fist to five, electronic quiz games, running records, four corners, or hand raising.Underlinethe names of any formative assessments.For example:Students will complete a one-paragraph reflection on the in-class simulation they experienced. They will be expected to write the reflection using complete sentences, proper capitalization and punctuation, and utilize an example from the simulation to demonstrate their understanding. Students will also take part in formative assessments throughout the lesson, such as thumbs up-thumbs middle-thumbs down and pair-share discussions, where you will determine if you need to re-teach or re-direct learning.        Explain how you will differentiate assessments for each of the following groups:·         English language learners (ELL):    ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
 
Extension Activity and/or HomeworkIdentify and describe any extension activities or homework tasks as appropriate. Explain how the extension activity or homework assignment supports the learning targets/objectives. As required by your instructor, attach any copies of homework at the end of this template.      Time Needed
Read More
Research Paper

English Language Arts Lesson Preparation & Morning Routine Paper

Planning effective English language arts lessons many times includes focusing on multiple literacy skills, aligned to state or national standards, while incorporating interesting, student-centered materials. When focusing on reading, it is essential to model metacognitive strategies, before, during, and after reading, including relevant vocabulary. A book walk is a powerful pre-reading strategy that can be used at all elementary grade levels. This strategy exposes students to a new piece of literary or informative text, while predicting text content and exploring vocabulary.

Throughout this course you will be creating a literature unit based on one piece of grade-appropriate literature (fiction or non-fiction) that includes all areas of reading development. Select a piece of literature suitable for the students in the “Class Profile.” ELM 480 English Language Arts Lesson Preparation & Morning Routine Paper

For this assignment, use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a lesson plan that incorporates a book walk,

Incorporate the following into your lesson plan:

  • Objectives aligned to state or national grade-appropriate vocabulary and reading standards
  • Content-specific vocabulary development
  • Technology or multimedia that supports developmentally appropriate, engaging instruction
  • Pre-reading strategies and activities
  • During reading strategies and activities
  • Post-reading activities and strategies
  • Assessment aligned to learning objectives, that is engaging for student and provides meaningful feedback
  • Differentiation to meet particular learning differences or needs

In addition, rationalize your instructional choices in a 250-500 word reflection, including how you will apply your findings to personal professional practices related to instruction and differentiation in the English language arts classroom. I have included the lesson plan template and the class profile. ***** The target grade is First grade*****

2attachments

Slide 1 of 2

  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_1attachment_1open in full 24px minthumb 20200624220639elm 480 t7 class profile 2 page 0
  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_2attachment_2open in full 24px min

Section 1: Lesson Preparation

Teacher Candidate Name:   
Grade Level:   
Date:  
Unit/Subject:  
Instructional Plan Title:  
Lesson Summary and Focus:In 2-3 sentences, summarize the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching. 
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping:Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.    
National/State Learning Standards:Review national and state standards to become familiar with the standards you will be working with in the classroom environment.Your goal in this section is to identify the standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented. Standards must address learning initiatives from one or more content areas, as well as align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments.Include the standards with the performance indicators and the standard language in its entirety.      
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives:Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards. When creating objectives, a learner must consider the following:Who is the audienceWhat action verb will be measured during instruction/assessmentWhat tools or conditions are being used to meet the learning What is being assessed in the lesson must align directly to the objective created. This should not be a summary of the lesson, but a measurable statement demonstrating what the student will be assessed on at the completion of the lesson. For instance, “understand” is not measureable, but “describe” and “identify” are.For example:Given an unlabeled map outlining the 50 states, students will accurately label all state names.  
Academic LanguageIn this section, include a bulleted list of the general academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary you need to teach. In a few sentences, describe how you will teach students those terms in the lesson.        
Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology:List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology you and the students will use during the lesson. As required by your instructor, add or attach copies of ALL printed and online materials at the end of this template. Include links needed for online resources.         

Section 2: Instructional Planning

Anticipatory SetYour goal in this section is to open the lesson by activating students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson and gaining student interest for the lesson. Consider various learning preferences (movement, music, visuals) as a tool to engage interest and motivate learners for the lesson.In a bulleted list, describe the materials and activities you will use to open the lesson. Bold any materials you will need to prepare for the lesson. For example:·         I will use a visual of the planet Earthand ask students to describe what Earth looks like.·         I will record their ideas on the white board and ask more questions about the amount of water they think is on planet Earth and where the water is located. Time Needed
Multiple Means of RepresentationLearners perceive and comprehend information differently. Your goal in this section is to explain how you would present content in various ways to meet the needs of different learners. For example, you may present the material using guided notes, graphic organizers, video or other visual media, annotation tools, anchor charts, hands-on manipulatives, adaptive technologies, etc.In a bulleted list, describe the materials you will use to differentiate instruction and how you will use these materials throughout the lesson to support learning. Bold any materials you will need to prepare for the lesson. For example:·         I will use a Venn diagram graphic organizer to teach students how to compare and contrast the two main characters in the read-aloud story.·         I will model one example on the white board before allowing students to work on the Venn diagram graphic organizer with their elbow partner.           Explain how you will differentiate materials for each of the following groups: ·         English language learners (ELL):   ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
Multiple Means of EngagementIn a bulleted list, describe the activities you will engage students in to allow them to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language. Bold any activities you will use in the lesson. Also, include formative questioning strategies and higher order thinking questions you might pose. For example:·         I will use a matching card activity where students will need to find a partner with a card that has an answer that matches their number sentence. ·         I will model one example of solving a number sentence on the white board before having students search for the matching card.·         I will then have the partner who has the number sentence explain to their partner how they got the answer.        Explain how you will differentiate activities for each of the following groups:·         English language learners (ELL):   ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
Multiple Means of ExpressionLearners differ in the ways they navigate a learning environment and express what they know. Your goal in this section is to explain the various ways in which your students will demonstrate what they have learned. Explain how you will provide alternative means for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all learners. Will you tier any of these products? Will you offer students choicesto demonstrate mastery? This section is essentially differentiated assessment.In a bulleted list, explain the options you willprovide for your students to express their knowledge about the topic. For example, students may demonstrate their knowledge in more summative ways through a short answer or multiple-choice test, multimedia presentation, video, speech to text, website, written sentence, paragraph, essay, poster, portfolio, hands-on project, experiment, reflection, blog post, or skit. Bold the names of any summative assessments.Students may also demonstrate their knowledge in ways that are more formative. For example, students may take part in thumbs up-thumbs middle-thumbs down, a short essay or drawing, an entrance slip or exit ticket, mini-whiteboard answers, fist to five, electronic quiz games, running records, four corners, or hand raising.Underlinethe names of any formative assessments.For example:Students will complete a one-paragraph reflection on the in-class simulation they experienced. They will be expected to write the reflection using complete sentences, proper capitalization and punctuation, and utilize an example from the simulation to demonstrate their understanding. Students will also take part in formative assessments throughout the lesson, such as thumbs up-thumbs middle-thumbs down and pair-share discussions, where you will determine if you need to re-teach or re-direct learning.        Explain how you will differentiate assessments for each of the following groups:·         English language learners (ELL):    ·         Students with special needs:   ·         Students with gifted abilities:   ·         Early finishers (those students who finish early and may need additional resources/support):    Time Needed
 
Extension Activity and/or HomeworkIdentify and describe any extension activities or homework tasks as appropriate. Explain how the extension activity or homework assignment supports the learning targets/objectives. As required by your instructor, attach any copies of homework at the end of this template.      Time Needed
Read More
Research Paper

Discussion: Lesson Planning and Preparation Paper

Among the most important aspects of English language proficiency development are the integration of ELL cultural values and beliefs into instruction and the differentiation of instruction to address specific learning needs of all students. These aspects can be accounted for directly within lesson plans.

For this assignment, you will integrate the cultural values and beliefs of ELLs into an English language arts lesson plan that includes components of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), using the “COE Lesson Plan Template.”

Using the “Class Profile,” select a grade level within Grades K-3. Include both Arizona ELP and ELA standards within the “National/State Learning Standards” section of the template. Align your learning targets/objectives with these standards.

Your lesson plan should also include:

Differentiated instructional strategies and learning activities to address your students’ language differences, giftedness, and special education needs listed on the “Class Profile.”

Technology that supports English language development.

Formative and summative assessments for the learning activities.

Your lesson plan must clearly explain how the teacher will represent the concepts to be taught, how your ELLs will express what they are learning, and how they will be engaged throughout the lesson.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Attached: Class Profile COE Lesson Plan template

Read Chapters 8, 15, 21, 25, 43, 47, and 50. URL: com/digital-resources/pearson/2015/50-strategies-for-teaching-english-language-learners_ebook_5e.php” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2015…

Read “Discriminating Children with Language Impairment Among English-Language Learners from Diverse First-Language Backgrounds,” by Paradis, Schneider, and Duncan, from Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (2013).URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search…

Read “Everyday Differentiation: How Administrators Support Differentiation of Curriculum and Instruction in Early Childhood Classrooms,” by Gadzikowski, from Exchange (2016).URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search…

Read “Six Differentiated Strategies for ESL Literacy for Birth to Third Grade Developmentally Disabled and Normal Students of Hispanic Heritage,” by Jaramillo and Jaramillo, located on the ERIC website.URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539139.pdf

Read “The Culturally Proficient Technologist,” by Johnson, from Educational Leadership (2015).

URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search…


Read “Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners,” by Ford, located on the Colorín Colorado website.

URL:

2attachments

Slide 1 of 2

  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_1attachment_1open in full 24px mindoc bw
  • open in full 24px minwordattachment_2attachment_2open in full 24px min
Read More