English Speech Analysis

Direction: Read the following speech excerpt delivered by Emily Esfahani Smith, a writer, who gave a speech “There’s more to life than being happy” at the Ted Talk, April 2017. Answer all the questions in the separate Answer book MS WORD file.

1. State the specific purpose of this speech? (2 marks)
2. Identify and explain the type of strategic organizational structure used in this
   speech with reference to the text. (4 marks)
3. Evaluate the effectiveness of the introduction (paragraphs 1 – 5) with specific
   reference to the text based on any TWO major objectives of an effective opening.
   (4 marks)
4. Identify TWO DIFFERENT TYPES of supporting materials in paragraph 7 and
   paragraph 9. With reference to the text, evaluate the effectiveness of the use of
   EACH type of supporting material with TWO reasons. (8 marks)

PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: The four milestone assignments in this course will prepare you to complete your final project, a case study analysis. In Milestone Two, you will begin
work on an outline of your final case study analysis paper. You will continue to explore the ideas you developed in Milestone One regarding the ethical conflicts
and interactions present in your chosen case study vignette. Take this information and form the basis of an outline for the entire paper. You do not need to fill out
all 11 areas at this time, but you do need to create and maintain working outline of your final project. Incorporate as much detail as possible as you progress
through the course. Here is a template for your case study analysis outline with the areas relevant to this milestone highlighted:

1. Title Page
2. Case Study Analysis Abstract
3. Detailed Case Study Vignette Description
4. The Ethical Conflict
5. The APA Code of Ethics Principles
   a. Identify and define all five principles
   b. Highlight, bold, or summarize all that might apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
   c. Justify why highlighted or bolded principles apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
6. The APA Code of Ethics Standards
   a. List and define all 10 standards
   b. Highlight, bold, or summarize all that might apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
   c. Justify why highlighted or bolded standards apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
7. Statement of Culture and Social Orientations in the Case Study
8. Statement of Dual Relationships or Multiple Relationship Issues in the Study
9. The Ethical Decision-Making Model (Eight-Step Model)
10. An Alternative Decision-Making Model
11. Summary and Conclusion
    For Milestone Two, produce a document containing the rough outline following the form above. You are expected to address the first four elements (title page,
    case study abstract, the detailed case study description, and the ethical conflict). You should provide a working title for the case study analysis (you are
    encouraged to flex your creative muscle), a preliminary draft of your abstract of your case study analysis (4–6 line description outlining both the case study
    vignette and your approach to analyzing the case study), a summary of your case study analysis (1–2 pages), and a discussion of the central ethical conflict in your
    case study (1 page). Remember that you will use instructor feedback to further revise this milestone, which contains moving pieces of your final project
    submission.
    Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2–3 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins, and any sources referenced cited in APA format.
    Rubric
    Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Not Evident (0%) Value
    Working Title Meets “Proficient” criteria and
    working title demonstrates
    creativity
    Includes a working title for the
    case study analysis
    Does not include a working title
    for the case study analysis
    10
    Case Study Analysis
    Abstract
    Meets “Proficient” criteria and
    abstract is the appropriate
    length and describes both case
    study vignette and approach to
    analyzing case study
    Includes a draft of the case
    study analysis abstract but does
    not describe both case study
    vignette and approach to
    analyzing case study
    Does not include a case study
    analysis abstract
    20
    Detailed Case Study
    Analysis Description
    Meets “Proficient” criteria and
    explains approach to analyzing
    case study
    Summarizes the chosen
    scenario, the important people,
    and the important interactions
    present in the case study
    Does not summarize the chosen
    scenario, the important people,
    and the important interactions
    present in the case study
    30
    The Ethical Conflict Meets “Proficient” criteria and
    identifies a strategy for resolving
    the central ethical conflict
    Examines central ethical conflict
    of case study and assesses
    interactions between different
    roles in the scenario
    Does not examine central ethical
    conflict of case study or assess
    interaction between different
    roles in the scenario
    30
    APA Writing No errors related to APA style or
    citations
    Few errors related to related to
    APA style and citations
    Major errors related to APA style
    and citations
    5
    Articulation of
    Response
    Submission is free of errors
    related to grammar, spelling,
    syntax, and organization and is
    presented in a professional and
    easy to read format with
    language that is appropriate to
    the intended audience
    Submission has no major errors
    related to grammar, spelling,
    syntax, organization or
    audience-appropriate
    terminology
    Submission has critical errors
    related to grammar, spelling,
    syntax, organization, or
    audience-specific language that
    prevent understanding of ideas
    5
    Earned Total 100%