|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe EnthymemeDoes the introduction contain a clearly stated, well-worded enthymeme? Does the enthymeme make an assertion which can be argued? Is the enthymeme logically sound?
|
| 15.0 pts
Excellent
Enthymeme is complex, original, logical, and structurally sound and answers a question at issue.
|
13.0 pts
Good
Enthymeme is in the correct form, clear, explained well, and answers a question at issue.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
Enthymeme is vague, has problems with its logic or form. Doesn’t answer a question at issue.
|
8.0 pts
Needs Work
No enthymeme. The paper lacks focus.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting EvidenceDoes the body of the paper support the enthymeme by providing arguments, reasons, and evidence? Does the paper engage at least two sources? Are quotes adequately introduced and explained? Does the essay fairly respond to at least one counter-argument?
|
| 30.0 pts
Excellent
Evidence cited is insightful, quotes are fully explained, paper engages relevant sources, and addresses a counter-argument
|
28.0 pts
Good
Each point is supported by specific and relevant examples.
|
26.0 pts
Satisfactory
The evidence is too general and may be repetitive. Some points are unsupported. Some examples don’t relate to the enthymeme.
|
20.0 pts
Needs Work
No examples given to support the argument.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationDoes the paper have a logical and cohesive structure? Does each paragraph have a topic sentence that connects to the enthymeme? Are there smooth transitions between paragraphs?
|
| 20.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs have clear topic sentences, smooth transitions, making for a cohesive, complex, and articulate argument.
|
18.0 pts
Good
Clear and cohesive structure to the paper with topic sentences and transitions. Argument is developed logically.
|
16.0 pts
Satisfactory
Paragraphs lack full cohesion. Transitions between points are needed. Topic sentences could be improved.
|
13.0 pts
Needs Work
Paper is unfocused. Paragraphs are not organized logically. Points are unrelated to the enthymeme.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisionIs this a genuine revision of your first version? Did you seriously address the structural and thematic concerns of the first version? Did you revise more than just punctuation, grammar, and usage errors?
|
| 15.0 pts
Excellent
This is a genuine revision of the first version that reconsiders and makes major changes to the content and organization based on the first version comments.
|
13.0 pts
Good
This is a good revision of the first version that addresses most of the feedback on the first version.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
This version addresses some of the major concerns. May contain only editorial (stylistic and mechanical) revisions.
|
9.0 pts
Needs Work
There has been no revision from the first version.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and StyleIs the language free of jargon, slang, and clichés? Do the sentences vary in length and structure? Are the grammatical and punctuation errors minimal, or do they interfere with the clarity of your writing?
|
| 15.0 pts
Excellent
Language is clear, precise, free of jargon, slang, and clichés. Sentences vary in length and structure. No mechanical errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
|
13.0 pts
Good
Most sentences are clear, unambiguous, and connect logically to preceding sentences. Sentences could be more varied. Very few mechanical errors.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory
Some sentences are awkward. Language may be vague or ambiguous. Some mechanical errors.
|
9.0 pts
Needs Work
Sentences are difficult to understand. Words are misused. Many mechanical errors.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat, Citation, LengthDoes the paper follow the MLA format instructions? Did you properly cite all your sources following MLA format? Does the paper meet the length requirement?
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent
Paper follows MLA format and all sources are correctly cited in MLA format. The paper meets the length requirement.
|
4.0 pts
Good
Paper follows MLA format and most sources are cited correctly. Paper meets length requirement.
|
2.0 pts
Needs Work
Paper is formatted incorrectly and most sources are not cited correctly. Paper is shorter than required
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
Paper is not formatted in MLA. Sources aren’t cited. Paper is significantly shorter than required.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
0 comments