Writing Discussions (2)

0 comments

Discussion 1

This week, we have studied coherence — the flow from one idea to the next — in writing. Let’s practice introducing and recognizing coherence. We looked at four specific ways of improving coherence:

  • Transitional words and phrases

Internet users do not always think about how their internet data is being used. Nonetheless, collecting and using data about search habits is big business.

  • Repetition of key works and phrases

Companies are able to track the searches made by various demographics and use data about these searches to target advertisements to likely customers. Customers will see advertisements that match their interests, but they have give up some privacy in return.

  • Pronoun reference

For some customers, this loss of privacy is acceptable, while others are deeply concerned.

  • Parallelism

Customers may worry about their search data getting into the wrong hands or about further intrusion into their private lives.

Discussion 2

This week we have looked at the use of parallel structure in a list. You have seen several examples of sentences with lists that do not use parallel structure and thought about how to revise them. As you look back at some of those sentences, what effect do you think that parallel structure has? Does it make sentences easier to understand? Does it make the sentences sound more rhythmic? Or would you argue that parallel structure is not that important? Answer in a paragraph, and quote sentences that do or do not use parallel structure in your response.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}