(Must be 4 to 5 Pages)
Reference must be write according to APA 7TH
Must be 100% Original Work Assignment must be follow Rubric Superior Criteria
Plz read My Note, Important tips (Wrote on 2nd Page) and also sample paper attached.
Must be use attached Three Article
NOTE: I hv attached 3 Articles & include each Article have (3 para) three paragraph summary, Analysis and application to the study.
Selected topic: Sustainable supply chain management in Rosewood trade (Annotated Bibliography must be write on related this topic & Apply)
MY Notes: (Must see sample paper)
Sample Annotated Bibliography attached so must be follow & minimum 3 pages required & three (3) peer-reviewed sources (no older than 5 years).
(4-5 Pages required )Must be include Abstract/Intro like in sample
Course: DDBA – Doctoral Study Mentoring
Selected topic: Sustainable supply chain management in Rosewood trade
Discussion 2: Annotated Bibliography
In each week of this course, you will research and select three (3) peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to develop an annotated bibliography that you can use in your Doctoral Study. You will need to take the three sources and synthesize the references into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports your study. For example, you may develop three references that will fit into the Nature of the Study (or any other component) and then the synthesized version will help you in developing your Prospectus/Proposal. Please see this week’s Learning Resources for the Sample Annotated Bibliography Template, which you should use to complete your annotated bibliography.
By Day 3
Post your synthesized annotated bibliography narrative that includes an explanation of how these references relate to one or more components of your Doctoral Study and incorporates specific references to the Doctoral Study Rubric.
Refer to the Week 4 Discussion 2 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.
Important tips: Include each Article annotated bibliography have three paragraph summary, Analysis and applies to the study
Walden’s recommendations for formatting an AB includes three areas, typically formatted in three paragraphs:
This first paragraph of the annotation summarizes the source. It outlines the main findings and primary methods of the study.
Summary: What did the author do? Why? What did he/she find?
This second paragraph of the annotation analyzes the source. It explains the benefits of the source but also the limitations.
Analysis: Was the author’s method sound? What information was missing? Is this a scholarly source?
This third paragraph of the annotation applies the source. It explains how the source’s ideas, research, and information can be applied to other contexts.
Application: Does this article apply to the literature? How would you be able to apply this method/study to your particular study? Is the article universal?
In general, annotated bibliographies should avoid referring to the first or second person (I, me, my, we, our, you, and us). Instead, students should aim to be objective and remove themselves from annotations. However, there may be some exceptions to this guideline. Check with your instructor if you are unsure about whether he/she will allow you to use “I” in your annotated bibliography.
Must be use Below Three Article for Annotated Bibliography & related intro & topic
Baaweh, L., Baddianaah, I., & Baatuuwie, B. N. (2022). Traditional knowledge and practices in Natural Resource Conservation: A Study of the Zukpiri Community Resource Management Area, Ghana. International Journal of Rural Management, 097300522210870. https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052221087020
Garzon Arbelaez, M. (1970, January 1). Rosewood trade: A case study of the imports into the United States. Scholarly Publishing Services – UW Libraries. Retrieved May 31, 2022, from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/48513
Obiri, D. B., Abukari, H., Oduro, K. A., Quartey, R. K., Dawoe, E. L., Twintoh, J. J., & Opuni-Frimpong, E. (2022). Rosewood (Pterocarpus erinaceus) as a de facto forest common for local communities in Ghana. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2021.1512
(Baaweh et al., 2022)
(Garzon Arbelaez, 1970)
(Obiri et al., 2022)
Assignment must be follow Rubric Superior Criteria
Rubric Detail
| Superior | Excellent | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Submitted | |
| Element 1: Annotated Bibliography (post and attach document) | 6.6 (30%) Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A thorough and detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. | 6.27 (28.5%) Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. One or two minor details are missing or lack clarity. | 5.61 (25.5%) Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. An explanation with some details of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. | 4.95 (22.5%) Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are somewhat synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A cursory statement of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. | 3.3 (15%) Does not meet minimal standards and/or is posted late. | 0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
| Element 2: Follow-up Responses | 8.8 (40%) On Day 5 and on Day 7, student’s responses fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers’ annotated bibliography. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts). | 8.36 (38%) On Day 5 and on Day 7, student shares some constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers’ annotated bibliography, but more depth and/or clarity around ideas is needed. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts). | 7.48 (34%) Student did not post on Day 5 and on Day 7, but he/she did engage with at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) during the week offering constructive feedback related to peers’ annotated bibliography. | 6.6 (30%) Student posts to at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) but response is cursory and/or off topic. | 4.4 (20%) Does not meet minimal standards and/or student posted late. | 0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
| Element 3: Written Delivery Style & Grammar | 3.3 (15%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors. | 3.13 (14.25%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar. | 2.81 (12.75%) Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar. | 2.48 (11.25%) Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style. | 1.65 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. | 0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
| Element 4: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations) | 3.3 (15%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors. | 3.13 (14.25%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format. | 2.81 (12.75%) Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident. | 2.48 (11.25%) Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident. | 1.65 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. | 0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
0 comments