I’m studying and need help with a Nursing question to help me learn.
Please watch this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/158t5I63azOyFAUD20…
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
- Complete the entire scenario.
- Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
- Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
- Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
- Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
- Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
- Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Learning Scenario Reflection (1)
Learning Scenario Reflection (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues
20 to >15.8 pts
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does not identify an acceptable understanding of of the issues in the scenario.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings, Theories, and Additional Research
20 to >15.8 pts
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues and the concepts and theories studied in the course readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information, conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend points made.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Makes somewhat vague connections between identified issues and concepts studied in readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with limited research.
11.8 to >0 pts
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements the reflection, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
0 comments