-
Case Study 5.2: California’s High-Speed Rail Project
A
goal of the Obama administration has been to promote high-speed rail
across the most populous and geographically-dispersed states in the
United States. The idea is to adopt more energy-saving initiatives while
also helping to improve state’s infrastructure. It is with this in
mind that the Federal Government made billions available to various
states in the 2008–2010 budget cycles. After the Fall, 2010 elections,
several states that had elected Republican governors refused the grants,
suspicious that this seed money would not be sufficient to pay for what
they viewed as unnecessary construction based on over-optimistic
expectations of the need for and use of high-speed rail. One of the
states that accepted the money and has moved forward strongly into
high-speed rail has been California, which has already begun work on a
65-mile section in the middle of the state, earning the derisive
nickname, the “train to nowhere.” This case details the state’s
projections regarding the need for high-speed rail, against the views of
infrastructure experts and critics who charge that for a state that is
already in a severe budget crisis, this is just the sort of project that
makes no sense economically or demographically.
Questions- Assess
the benefits and drawbacks of the high-speed rail project. In your
opinion, do benefits outweigh drawbacks, or vice versa? Why? Justify
your answer. - What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
- Could
you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective
of a massive public works initiative? In other words, what other
factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail
project? Why are they important?
Case Study 6.1: Columbus Instruments
This
case is based on a true story of a once-successful organization that
had allowed its project management practices to degenerate to the point
where assignment to a project team was often a mark of disfavor and a
sign of pending termination. The case involves issues of motivation,
structural effects on projects, and project team staffing. It offers
students an opportunity to see how, if left unchecked, certain behaviors
by department heads and others in the organization can work counter to
the desires to use project teams to improve organizational profitability
and instead make them a dumping ground for malcontents and poor
performers.
Questions- What
are the implications of CIC’s approach to staffing project teams? Is
the company using project teams as training grounds for talented
fast-trackers, or as dumping grounds for poor performers? - How would you advise the CEO to correct the problem? Where would you start?
- Discuss
how issues of organizational structure and power played a role in the
manner in which project management declined in effectiveness at CIC.
The answer should be in APA 7th edition format.
- Assess
University of the Cumberlands Week 3 California High Speed Rail Project Case Study
0 comments