• Home
  • Blog
  • University of Michigan Language Variation and Standard Language Essay

University of Michigan Language Variation and Standard Language Essay

0 comments

250 words

Task:

  • Select one of the following words : woke, tea, shade
  • Research the most “contemporary” definitions of the word you chose (both “standard” and informal or “slang”). You should be able to find a dictionary definition for most of these (e.g., https://www.merriam-webster.com/ (Links to an external site.), dictionary.com (Links to an external site.)) but if not, consult other definitions on the web. [If you’re having trouble finding the more informal definition or history of shade, try looking up throwing shade.]
  • Research the history of the word. Using google is fine but you should consult more than one source and be sure to include a dictionary with good etymological information (try to avoid urban dictionary)!
  • In one page do the following, and submit your page online to Canvas:
    1. Based on your research, provide one “standard” modern and one “informal/slang” modern definition of one of the words above.
    2. Briefly describe the origins and the history of the word. Discuss the origins of the chosen non-slang meaning, as well as the history of the chosen informal/slang sense of the word. Please address the following:
      • What social group did the new (informal, slang) meanings of the word begin in? How did it gain more widespread use? Has it changed since being used by more people? Has it been added to a scholarly dictionary you use? (Be sure to state which scholarly dictionary you use.)
    3. The new senses of these words took shape in specific social groups before they entered into mainstream American English. Identify and briefly describe one pressure external to language (e.g., geography, social identity, contact between different social groups) and one pressure internal to language (e.g. phonetic or semantic change) that took place in the history of the word.
    4. These words and/or their new senses are often labeled by non-linguists as “slang”. Reflect on the following questions and write a well-structured paragraph about what it means for something to be “slang” and when it becomes the “standard”.
      • Define the concept “standard language” as found in a scholarly source (e.g. pp 159-160 in your textbook, or another source; do not make up your own definition here!) Include a discussion of the role of power in decisions about what words are included in the “standard language”.
      • What does it mean for a word to be labeled as “slang”?
      • What does it mean for the word to be “added to the dictionary”? What makes something “dictionary-worthy”?
      • Is being added to a published dictionary enough for a word to go from “slang” to “standard”?

To see the purpose and skills this assignment is designed to address, please click here.

Criteria for success: See the grading rubric below.

Rubric

Rubric for Written Assignment 4B

Rubric for Written Assignment 4B

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength1 page

1 pts

Full Marks

Meets length requirement

0 pts

No Marks

Does not meet length requirement

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

2 to >1.0 pts

Full Marks

Paragraphs are well constructed with clear topic sentences, and coherent. Few or no grammatical errors. Citations. (-.5 if missing citations)

1 to >0.5 pts

Needs improvement

Problems in paragraph construction but overall coherent. Significant grammatical errors.

0.5 to >0 pts

No Marks

Paragraphs are incoherent. Major and/or many sentence-level grammatical errors.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinitions

1 to >0.5 pts

Full Marks

Gives definitions of one “standard” and one “slang” sense.

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Definitions and history partly done, or one done well and one poorly.

0 pts

No Marks

Definitions missing.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory (etymology)

2 to >1.0 pts

Full Marks

Fully treats the origins of one “standard” and one “slang” sense (meaning) following the questions posed.

1 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

History of both senses partly treated, or one done well and one poorly.

0 pts

No Marks

Missing

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExternal and Internal Pressures

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Full Marks

External and Internal pressures addressed.

1 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Both pressures treated, but one dealt with poorly; or both treated poorly

0 pts

No Marks

Missing

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on “standard” language

2.5 to >2.0 pts

Full Marks

Clearly and adequately addresses all questions posed.

2 to >1.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Clearly and adequately 2 to 3 of the questions posed.

1.5 to >0.5 pts

Poor

Treats 1 point posed, and/or poorly explains the points posed.

0.5 to >0 pts

No Marks

Missing

2.5 pts

Total Points: 10

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}