|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Selection
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks (the maximum award in an examination or assessment)
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant yet previously less- explored aspects of the topic.
|
3 pts
Milestones (an action or event marking a significant change or stage in development)
Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
|
2 pts
Milestones (an action or event marking a significant change or stage in development)
Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
|
1 pts
Benchmark (a point of reference from which measurements may be made)
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
|
3 pts
Milestones
Presents in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
|
2 pts
Milestones
Presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
|
1 pts
Benchmark
Presents information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant subdisciplines.
|
3 pts
Milestones
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
|
2 pts
Milestones
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
|
1 pts
Benchmark
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
|
3 pts
Milestones
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
|
2 pts
Milestones
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
|
1 pts
Benchmark
L ists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
|
3 pts
Milestones
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
|
2 pts
Milestones
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
|
1 pts
Benchmark
States an ambiguous, illogical, or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
|
| 4 pts
Full Marks
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
|
3 pts
Milestones
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
|
2 pts
Milestones
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
|
1 pts
Benchmark
Presents limitations and implications, but they are possibly irrelevant and unsupported.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
Total Points: 24
|
0 comments