Hello, I would like you to follow the instructions below as carful as you can so it can be easier for you to understand and finish this assignment.
1) Logistics (2 points max):
? Name of meeting attended
? Date and time of the meeting
? Length of the meeting
2) Participants (2 points max):
? How many people were in attendance? If you could only see the committee members, how many committee members were in attendance? If you could see all of the attendees, was there a large public turnout? If so, how many people?
? Do your best to identify the demographic characteristics of those in attendance (i.e. race, gender, age). If you were able to see committee members as well as community members, did you observe similarities/differences in their demographics?
3) Topics Discussed (14 points max):
? How many items were on the agenda? You do not have to provide a detailed description of all
the items on the agenda; rather, you must identify the total number of items on the agenda and summarize the key types of issues that were addressed (i.e. informational vs. action items).
? Identify two or three specific agenda items that you found to be most interesting and discuss
them in detail by doing the following: summarize them, discuss the arguments that were made
for and against them, identify the main participants in the discussion and make sure to discuss if and how the issues were resolved. If a vote was taken, discuss the result of the vote.
4) Technology and Participation (2 points max):
? If you attended/viewed a virtual meeting respond to the following: o How effectively (or
ineffectively) was technology utilized to run the meeting? How, for example, was public
comment handled? How easy was it to find the meeting on the city’s website and/or YouTube
channel?
o Do you think that virtual meetings make the planning process more or less accessible the general public? Explain.
o When the pandemic is under control and in-person meetings resume, what would be your recommendation for the continuation or discontinuation of virtual planning meetings?
Explain.
5) Personal Evaluation (8 points max): This is a critical component of your paper. Include the following and/or any other questions you deem germane to the assignment. Incorporate specific examples to substantiate your evaluation. You may also incorporate lecture and reading materials into your analysis.
? What did you learn about the issues that were discussed?
? What did you learn about the planning process? Were there any unexplained issues and/or a lot of jargon and legalese? Was the meeting run well? Was public comment encouraged? Were any controversial items on the agenda? If so, how were they handled? Was decisive action taken on agenda items? Was the meeting easy to follow?
? Compare your observations with the material that we have read and discussed in class so far are theory and practice in alignment?
6) Organization (2 points max.): The paper should be clearly organized and include all of the required material. The paper should be written in paragraph format (not lists or bullet points). You may find it useful to incorporate section headings.
Additional Information
Meeting Attendance: Ideally you should view/attend the entire meeting. However, if the meeting runs longer than two hours, you may leave after two hours.
Formatting: The paper should be double-spaced using 12-point font and 1” margins. Proper grammar and syntax are expected. The paper should be written in essay format and prepare a 2–3-page summary and evaluation of the meeting with APA or Chicago format. Don’t forget to add work cited page.
You are going to choose from this website to finish this assignment.
https://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?%20%20%20%20view_id=20
0 comments