Hello, I’ve included a screen shot of the graded rubric that shows my score and also the comments she left about the paper. Below is the new rubric for the paper.
- Revision guide
- Entire final draft of review of article, double spaced, including:
- Title page with Abstract (250-300 words for abstract – please single space abstract)
- Body: Introduction/Narrative/Conclusion (1200-1250 words, double spaced) – Final draft of your review of article, including the items included in the Outline of ROA slides.
- Please use these headings: Introduction, Narrative, Conclusion
- 8 supporting references listed on separate References page in APA format (double spaced) and cited in the text. Supporting articles should be from within the last 10 years, unless you can justify why an older source must be used.
- In the footer of the document please place your abstract word count and your body word count separately (see example title page for how to do this).
- Page numbers in the upper right corne
-
- Use this format for naming your paper before uploading: FirstName-LastName-Reviewfinal-W18.docx
| Review of Article – Final Draft Rubric | |
| Criteria | Points |
|
Revision Guide Make sure you have addressed your grader’s comments completely. Short or vague guides will lose points. Be sure to highlight your revisions through the paper. |
5 |
|
Reference Use and Listing Everything is correctly in APA. You must have a citation list, in alphabetical order. Every source must be cited in the paper, and the sources must be scholarly, appropriate, and recent. |
5 |
|
Abstract, Title Page, Word Count, etc. Your abstract must be between 250-300 words and it must be focused on your paper, not only the lead article. Don’t forget the title page or word counts. |
5 |
|
Introduction and Conclusion Make sure your thesis discusses the limitations of the lead article. It must introduce your paper, not simply describe the lead article. Your conclusion should not repeat exactly your introduction. |
6 |
|
Narrative You must address three limitations, discuss with support why they are limitations, and discuss with support how they can be remedied. Do not use quotations, and make sure that your Turn It In score is as low as possible. |
9 |
| TOTAL | 30 |
Rubric
Review of Article – Final Draft
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevision Guide |
5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Use and Listing |
5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract, Title Page, Word Count, etc. |
5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion |
6 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrative |
9 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 30 |
|||
0 comments