• Home
  • Blog
  • The Earth, Mars and Venus all started out after the formation of the Solar System with similar atmospheres. Over time, they have evolved differently. Research why they are so different now​

The Earth, Mars and Venus all started out after the formation of the Solar System with similar atmospheres. Over time, they have evolved differently. Research why they are so different now​

0 comments

Your research paper should be 2-5 pages, single space, with all references/web sites cited following MLA style and include URLs of all sites visited.

NAS 125 Research Assignment Option A Grading Rubric

NAS 125 Research Assignment Option A Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Knowledge

4.0 pts

Expert

The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

3.0 pts

Proficient

The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

2.0 pts

Apprentice

The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

1.0 pts

Novice

The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Focus

4.0 pts

Expert

The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.

3.0 pts

Proficient

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.

2.0 pts

Apprentice

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

1.0 pts

Novice

The topic is not clearly defined.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Discussion

4.0 pts

Expert

In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.

3.0 pts

Proficient

In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.

2.0 pts

Apprentice

The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runson excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

1.0 pts

Novice

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCohesiveness

4.0 pts

Expert

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

3.0 pts

Proficient

For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

2.0 pts

Apprentice

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

1.0 pts

Novice

Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar

3.0 pts

Expert

No spelling &/or grammar mistakes.

2.0 pts

Proficient

Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes.

1.0 pts

Apprentice

Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes.

0.0 pts

Novice

Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

3.0 pts

Expert

More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Specialinterest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

2.0 pts

Proficient

5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

1.0 pts

Apprentice

Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peerreviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.

0.0 pts

Novice

Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peerreviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations

3.0 pts

Expert

Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.

2.0 pts

Proficient

Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.

1.0 pts

Apprentice

Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect.

0.0 pts

Novice

Does not cite sources.

3.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}