Answer the below questions after reading the respective case studies:
Case Study 3.1 Keflavik Paper Company
- Keflavik Paper presents a good example of the dangers of excessive reliance on one screening technique (in this case, discounted cash flow). How might
- Assume that you are responsible for maintaining Keflavik’s project portfolio. Name some key criteria that should be used in evaluating all new projects before they are added to the current portfolio.
- What does this case demonstrate about the effect of poor project screening methods on a firm’s ability to manage its projects effectively
- Case Study 4.1—In Search of Effective Project Manager
- 1. Imagine you are a human resources professional at Pureswing who has been assigned to develop a program for recruiting new project managers. Design a job description for the position.
- 2. What qualities and personal characteristics support a higher likelihood of success as a project manager?
- 3. What qualities and personal characteristics would make it difficult to be a successful project manager?
0 comments