• Home
  • Blog
  • Taft College Age Graded Informal Social Control Theory Discussion Paper

Taft College Age Graded Informal Social Control Theory Discussion Paper

0 comments

submit a Theory Journal Entry based on the five steps outlined in the Syllabus, the Course Introduction video, and the . For this Entry, you must use the Age-Graded Informal Social Control Theory (see below for theory details)

Current events (for Steps 4 & 5 only) must have occurred, OR been updated, within the last month or so (4-6 weeks). Events must have occurred within the United States. Please use only one article/website/video/audio source.


AgeGraded Informal Social Control Theory (Attached Example Theory below)

Robert Sampson & John Laub (1993)

Students of Hirschi who built on his original theory social bonding

Expanded on Hirschi’s social bonds to explain changes in crime over the life course

But, did not believe that criminality was permanently set like G&H argued that selfcontrol was in their newer theory

Argued that key life events altered people’s social bonds

Key life events or “turning points” include:

Marriage/Divorce Children

Higher education Employment Employment

Military service Illness/Accident/Death

AgeGraded Informal Social Control Theory

Turning points can either strengthen or weaken social bonds

S&L argued that younger people have weak bonds and therefore commit more crime

Because they have not yet experienced marriage, children, higher education, careers, military service, etc

.But, as we age, turning points typically strengthen our bonds to conventional society and lead to desistance from the crime/delinquency of our youth

Because we don’t want to sacrifice/lose our attachments & commitments

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}