“President’s Effect in Appointing Federal Judges and Analysis of the 2013 Decision Regarding DOMA” Please respond to the following:
- Referring to the study regarding the effect of presidential philosophy on the selection of judges in chapter 7, determine two (2) ways in which presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making. Draw three (3) conclusions from the study. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.
- From the e-Activity, summarize three (3) key issues that the DOMA decision of 2013 addressed that fall under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Indicate which of the three (3) issues you believe will have the greatest overall impact on society in the future. Justify your response.
- Very detailed (more screenshots of chapter 7’s study and the e- activity will be placed in attachments)
Peer’s Post to respond to:
“Hi Classmate and Prof
T1. here should be an outsized range of vacancies accessible so as for the president to be able to guarantee those spots get crammed by people that share like-mindedness because of the president. The people to be selected quite seemingly share the same viewpoint or philosophy as what the president likes.
2. The president will fill vacancies within the Court of Appeals with potential future nominees, this can provide the folks he desires area unit setup to slip into judiciary spots regardless if he’s still president or not and still pursue deciding helpful to his party.
conclusions that I draw from the study
1. Additional legal, personal, philosophic, and political influences can sadden the Supreme Court and its decision-making method.
2. Decision-making power can have supported or appeal from alternative branches of the government
3. Co-equal branches that interpret the law, and policymakers to increasing equality in the higher cognitive process from the e-Activity, summarize 3 (3) key problems that the DOMA call of 2013 addressed that represent the amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Indicate that of the 3 (3) problems you think can have the best overall impact on society within the future. Justify your response.
1.legally married same-sex couples are currently entitled to identical federal advantages as married opposite-sex couples
2. Spousal consent currently additionally applies to same-sex marriages
3. Same-sex spouses are entitled to use put aside funding to buy out-of-pocket expenses I feel that of the three problems addressed, federal advantages to opposite-sex couples can have the best impact on society within the future. Same-sex partners will currently file federal work as one or two as opposition people and additionally able to file taxes along. Being a member of the military, same-sex marriages mean that a relationship may be recognized and receive medical and dental advantages moreover because of the insurance policy.-act.”
Peer
0 comments