Part 1
Explain how and why Luke may have edited Mark’s Gospel. Use the following two sets of passages to support your claim.
According to course materials (Bible, textbook, digital materials linked below, etc.):
1. How and why would Luke have edited Mark 14:3-9 contrasted with Luke 7:36-50?
2. How and why would Luke have edited Mark 3:31-35 contrasted with Luke 8:19-21?
Be sure to distinguish between paraphrase and direct quotes. Type a 450–750-word paper using MLA formatting.
Only use the following attachments for references.
Part 2
Needs a research paper and a powerpoint presentation. The write-up is limited to 12-15 double-spaced pages, not including a title page and exhibits (include as appendices).
USE THE 9-STEP CASE ANALYSIS PROCESS AS A GUIDE:
- 1.Skim the case to get an overview of the situation.
- 2.Read the case thoroughly to digest the facts.
- 3.Carefully Review information in exhibits.
- 4.Decide what the strategic issues are.
- 5.Begin your analysis with some number crunching.
- 6.Apply the concepts of strategic analysis.
- 7.Check out conflicting opinions
- 8.Support your opinions with reasons and evidence.
- 9.Develop recommendations and an action plan.
Your analysis and recommendations should be supported with high-quality evidence, including textbooks and peer-reviewed academic journal articles covering the appropriate topics that apply to your specific problem from the following list:
Accounting
- 1.Business Communications
- 2.Business Ethics
- 3.Business Finance
- 4.Business Integration and Strategic Management
- 5.Business Leadership
- 6.Economics
- 7.Global Dimensions of Business
- 8.Information Management Systems
- 9.Legal Environment of Business
- 10.Management
- 11.Marketing
- 12.Quantitative Research Techniques/Statistics
The following has been pre-written by myself to help assist with this paper. (Part 1)
For years, Wells Fargo has had a reputable image of good management. It is the third-largest bank in the United States. The success of this company is attached to its cultural perspective and economic structure that integrates customer needs and a continually engaging sales culture (Tayan, 2019). Nonetheless, these aspects have not protected the company from a series of scandals that seem to reoccur. Four years ago, the company faced a fake-account humiliation which led to significant losses. The fake accounts led to customers losing a lot of their money. The company began to remediate those affected previously by its history of scandals through legal settlements and refunds (Tayan, 2019). The bank had its employees open numerous fake bank and credit accounts to meet their sales goals. Other than that, the bank forced its customers to get unnecessary auto insurance. Other customers experienced wrongful repossession of their vehicles, and the bank also inflicted excessive fees for those seeking mortgages. People allege the bank mistreats its workers by making them work overtime without extra pay. All these factors have added to the company’s continued struggles, which is a significant disadvantage to shareholders and employees.
References
Tayan, B. (2019). The Wells Fargo cross-selling scandal. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance No. CGRP-62 Version, 2, 17-1.
The following has been written by myself to help assist with this paper(Part 2)
The above highlight indicates that Wells Fargo, despite its popularity in the previous years, the bank continues to face difficulties following the bank’s decision to go beyond the stipulated guidelines of operation. The need to achieve the set organization goals failed to align with customers’ needs as the bank exploited its customers and could not give them the satisfaction they desired (Cavico et al., 2017). Instead of the bank to better the financial situation of its customers, it concentrated more on achieving its goals. Hence, leaving customers dissatisfied.
The continued financial ramification of Wells Fargo gives an illustration of the challenges an organization faces when it refrains from running its operations as required by the law (Cavico et al., 2017). Therefore, businesses and companies should learn from those who have suffered losses due to negligence or actions against the guidelines to safeguard business operations.
References
Cavico, F. J., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2017). Wells Fargo’s fake accounts scandal and its legal and ethical implications for management. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 82(2), 4.
0 comments