Short Paper (two page max.) creating an argument using Toulmin’s model for argumentation on the usefulness or uselessness of Statement on Standards for Forensic Services No. 1 (SSFS 1) in forensic accounting practice.

Short Paper (two page max.) creating an argument using Toulmin’s model for argumentation on the usefulness or uselessness of Statement on Standards for Forensic Services No. 1 (SSFS 1) in forensic accounting practice. Background: The statement prohibits CPAs from accepting contingency fees in a litigation engagement and opining on the legal conclusion of the occurrence of fraud. The statement does not prohibit expert opinions relating to whether evidence is consistent with the elements of fraud based on objective evaluation. SSFS 1 will not allow an expert witness/member to provide an agreed-upon procedures engagement. When evaluating the agreed-upon procedures of SSFS 1, limit the scope to the Section in the Statement on Standards for Valuation Services (VS-100 or SSVS 1) to the question, are calculations of value allowed after SSFS 1?Short Paper (two page max.) creating an argument using Toulmin’s model for argumentation on the usefulness or uselessness of Statement on Standards for Forensic Services No. 1 (SSFS 1) in forensic accounting practice. The paper is not an essay. You need to take a position and prepare a seamless argument based on Toulmin’s model for argumentation.