Using the attached instructions and case study I need two deliverables for this project. One is a security plan and the other is recommendation memo. The security plan should be a minimum of 5 pages. And the memo a minimum of one. The grading rubric is a follows. Recommendation Memo
Clearly introduces and summarizes the security plan.
Basically introduces and summarizes the security plan.
Weakly introduces and summarizes the security plan.
Little introduction or summary of the security plan. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
Doesn’t introduce or summarize the security plan.
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 3 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 6 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
Non-MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. More than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Security Strategy
Clearly describes the security strategy being proposed. Strategy covers the confidentiality, integrity and availability.
Basically describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers most of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability.
Weakly describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers some of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability.
Little description of security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy may cover a few of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
No description of security strategy solutions. Doesn’t address any of the following: confidentiality, integrity or availability.
Clearly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
Basically describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
Weakly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
Little description of the linkage between each technology and the strategy. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
No description of any linkage between each technology and the strategy.
Clear, detailed network diagram that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
Basic network diagram with some details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
Network diagram with weak details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
Network diagram with little or no details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
Missing or no network diagram.
Security Technologies
Clearly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least three (3) technologies.
Basically describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least two (2) technologies.
Weakly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least one (1) technology.
Little description of technologies being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
Doesn’t describe the technologies being proposed.
Clear and detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
Basic, but detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
Weak and poorly detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
Little detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
No sufficient details in the description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
Finds and Applies Knowledge
Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No APA style errors in sources.
Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.
Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.
May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May use NIST SP 800-53. May not have used APA style formatting.
No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper. NIST SP 800-53 not mentioned.
All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.
All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.
All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.
All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
Organization, Execution and Appearance
Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Overall Score
0 comments