Initial Discussion: For this Fine Arts discussion, you will choose one of the in-depth studies from this week and watch all associated videos and links. Things to consider in your post, how does what you learned about your in-depth study help you to better understand art, better understand the world, or better understand humanity? If you learned about a specific artist or work, how did the artist’s life reflect in his work? How did the time period or things going on in the world affect the art? Be sure to give at least 2 examples of how the context you learned deepened your understanding. Beyond that, you may talk about how the art or artist spoke to you, what you felt when looking at the art and learning more about it, and how the art, artist, or time period relates to today or specific areas of our humanity.
n-Depth Study Cinema: A Look at Documentaries with the first documentary, Nanook of the North
Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North is oft considered the first documentary. The discussion of the film gives insight into documentary making and some of the ethical issues around documentary making and the potential exploitation of marginalized peoples. Below are videos about the film as well as the full film.
| Art in Context Discussion Rubric Spring 2021 (2) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Comprehension of Terminology |
8 pts Full Marks The cultural work(s) or artist(s) in the area of study is/are identified correctly; vocabulary and terms learned within the module lesson were used to describe and analyze the cultural artifact(s) or artist(s) is are used correctly, effectively and clearly. 6 pts Emerging The cultural work(s) or artist(s) in the area of study is/are identified correctly; most vocabulary and terms learned within the module lesson were used to describe and analyze the cultural artifact(s) or artist(s) are used somewhat effectively and clearly. 4 pts Needs Improvement The cultural work(s) or artist(s) in the area of study is/are identified somewhat correctly; vocabulary and terms learned within the module lesson were either used incorrectly, were to vague, or were used ineffectively. 0 pts No Marks The cultural work(s) or artist(s) in the area of study is/are not identified or lacks accuracy; vocabulary is incorrect or ineffectively used to describe the the cultural artifact(s) or artist(s). Student did not respond to the discussion |
/ 8 pts |
|
Contextual Analysis |
10 pts Full Marks Student accurately articulates multiple ways in which historical events, an artist’s experiences or biographical details, symbolism, and/or societal norms impacted a specific artwork or the overarching artwork of an artist. 7 pts Emerging Student articulates some understanding of contextual analysis and applies it to a work of art or an artist’s body of work, but shows some limitations in grasping the full affect of context either in accuracy or depth. 4 pts Needs Improvement Student clearly attempts to apply contextual analysis to a work of art or an artist’s body of work, but has major flaws in accuracy, understanding, or depth of analysis. 0 pts No Marks Student does not attempt to contextually analyze a work or body of work by an artist. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Use of Sources |
8 pts Full Marks Student clearly backs-up opinions with information from the sources provided or sources found outside of class. If using sources outside of class, student gives a citation. 6 pts Emerging Student is able to back-up some assertions with materials from class or outside sources. 3 pts Needs Improvement Student does not back-up argument with source material, or does so incorrectly. 0 pts No Marks Student does not back up claims with sources. |
/ 8 pts |
|
Critical Thinking |
8 pts Full Marks Post demonstrates understanding of the material and brings forth fresh ideas and perspectives. Post demonstrates engagement with the topic and the ability to make connections between the subject matter and the world. 6 pts Emerging Post demonstrates some understanding of the material and fresh ideas and perspectives, but may have some issues with either understanding the material or connecting that understanding to ideas. 3 pts Needs Improvement Understanding of the material or connections made have major issues. 0 pts No Marks Post does not demonstrate understanding to material or make connections. |
/ 8 pts |
|
Communication Usage and Grammar |
6 pts Full Marks Posts are well-written, free, or very nearly free of grammatical and usage errors. 4 pts Emerging Posts are generally well-written, but may have some minor issues with grammar and usage. 2 pts Needs Improvement Post is difficult to read due to grammar and usage problems. 0 pts No Marks Posts are unreadable or not attempted. |
/ 6 pts |
|
Response Post Quality |
10 pts Full Marks Respond to at least one classmate who chose a different in-depth study. Provided a detailed discussion with well thought out specific examples and interaction with fellow students that contributed to a conversation about their contextual analysis. 8 pts Emerging Respond to at least one classmate who chose a different in-depth study. The discussion introduced only vague statements without any developing or detailed ideas to promote a discussion. 4 pts Needs Improvement Provided a detailed discussion with well thought out specific examples and interaction with fellow students. However, failed to respond to at least one classmate who chose a different in-depth study. 0 pts No Marks Does not contribute to discussion with fellow classmates, or violates Netiquette rules, or participated in the discussion after the due date. |
/ 10 pts |
| Total Points: 0 | ||
Add a Comment:
0 comments