• Home
  • Blog
  • Saint Thomas University Pap Smear Screening Essay

Saint Thomas University Pap Smear Screening Essay

0 comments

Please Follow all instructions and rubric!!!


Disease Screenings


Share your experiences( choose PAP smear, Diabetes, Colorectal Cancer with disease screenings and how you would respond to patients who are apprehensive about getting screened for certain diseases.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
  • Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Discussion Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Points
    Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts Distinguished – 5 points
    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
    Excellent – 4 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    Fair – 2 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    Poor – 1 point
    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    5 points
    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Distinguished – 3 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    Excellent – 2 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    Fair – 1 point
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
    Poor – 0 points
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
    3 points
    Response to Posts of Peers Distinguished – 2 points
    Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
    Fair – 1 point
    Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
    Poor – 0 points
    Student provided no response to a peer’s post.
    2 points
    Total Points 10

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}