I am writing a mini thesis on risk,
uncertainties and regulatory policies for banks in the financial markets. Given
that risk can never be completely mitigated or hedged, argument would have to
show an in depth analysis on affects and results made by regulatories/policy
and banks. Any other relevant anaylsis or current information to further topic
is welcome. The main goal and conclusion is to analyse the success
or failure
of banks and the market behavior before and after risk is mitigated.
·
Word count: +5000 words without
references/biolography
·
References/biolography will
also be needed after conclusion page
·
Formatt: APA style
·
Due date: 29th August
Please find the outline I would like to
follow.
A.
Introduction
B.
Methods of organizing and synthesizing data (please how data is use and
compared)
C.
Data Analysis and findings of results on accurate risk assessment across
categories such as Credit risk, market risk, operational risk and risk
quantification under normal as well as stressed conditions
D.
Quantitative View on Mitigating risk by banks and regulators (economic
capital)
Subtopics:
1.
Correlations and differences on how Financial Regulators regulate
2.
Mitigating internal and external risk factors
3.
Why risk management cannot assess all market risks (please give current
scenarios and current market example)
4.
Other avenues market manipulator are currently using (e.g. shadow
banking)
5.
Lack of Confidence and weakness in Basel III Accord
6.
Illustrate banking performance/behaviors
7.
How important is risk mitigation to banks and the financial market
8.
Who else plays a role in mitigate risk management
9. Markets that are proactive markets vs the lagging financial governors on potential risk and uncertainties
0 comments