- Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by adding what you learned in the Discussion Board posts following the task, as well as taking into consideration your instructor’s comments.
- Address the following questions in 1,000–1,250 words, and incorporate your responses into your Week 4 Key Assignment:
- Should the United States restructure the FBI, up to and including its termination and the creation of a new agency, and recreate it to reflect the MI-5 model?
- What strategy components would you take from the MI-5 model, if any, and incorporate into your strategic plan? Explain in detail.
- The U.S. DHS recently scrapped the oft-ridiculed color-coded Terrorism Alert System in favor of a new three-tiered system.
- What were the inadequacies of the old system? Is the new system going to be more effective? Explain.
- The 2007 National Homeland Security Strategy cites the need for America’s homeland security construct to embrace a more “all hazard” approach to preparedness, response, and recovery efforts.
- Is adopting an “all hazard” approach going to distract from the counterterrorism mission of key agencies? Is this an appropriate approach for your strategy document to take?
- Given the events of the past 10 years and the nation’s current threat profile, is the term “homeland security” still relevant? Explain.
- Should counterterrorism be predominately a law enforcement effort and all other hazards be embodied by the “emergency management” concept? Why or why not?
- You must support all arguments with scholarly and academic resources.
- Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
Please submit your assignment.
0 comments