Real Estate Question

0 comments

Suppose that you work for Camden Property Trust (Links to an external site.), a multi-family REIT in the southern US, and that your company wants to add another apartment building to its investment portfolio. After conducting a thorough market analysis, you have narrowed your search to three properties located in different areas in Houston, Texas. All of the properties have a similar number of units, and the units are also similar with regard to mix and sizes. The primary differences is the supply and demand in the different market areas, and the consideration of newer versus older properties

Option 1: The first property is currently built and operating in a middle income area that has a shortage of housing. At this time, the building has no vacancy, but there are some new apartments being built nearby that will soon be competing with this property. This is the oldest property, and will likely be impacted by the new construction in the area that may take away tenants.

Option 2: The second property is currently under construction, and is being sold because the developer has run out of money, and is unable to finish the project. However, it is likely that your firm could complete the building at a favorable per-unit cost. The market area is close to equilibrium, but with some excess supply, and the completion of this property would add even more. However, it would be a new building – something that is often attractive to potential tenants.

Option 3: The third property currently has a relatively high vacancy rate. However, the market area has become an increasingly desirable area to live and demand is expected to grow. There is also little threat of new competition here because there are no sites available to build additional apartment complexes.

Given these vacancy considerations, which property would you choose? Are there other investment factors that may be impacted by these considerations?

To receive a score of 100% requires a well-written reply with over of 200 words and a clear-cut, persuasive argument that includes references to the text and/or outside resources (see rubric below).

Rubric

Application Assignments

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletely answered all questions

25 pts

Answered all questions

15 pts

Answered most questions

10 pts

Answered only a few questions

5 pts

Response was vague and unrelated to questions

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy of information

25 pts

Accurate information

10 pts

Vague information

0 pts

Inaccurate information

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWell written

25 pts

Thorough explanation with clear examples

20 pts

Explanation with somewhat clear examples

10 pts

Missing clear examples

5 pts

Explanation is inadequate and too brief

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord count

25 pts

200 words or more

20 pts

150 to 200 words

10 pts

100 to 150 words

5 pts

Under 100 words

25 pts

Total Points: 100

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}