ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
- Due DateThursday, February 20, 2020Points Possible150
- Click the link above to submit your assignment.Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming DesignDue Week 6 and worth 150 points
This assignment consists of two (2) sections: a design document and a revised Gantt chart or project plan. You must submit both sections as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment for which it is written. Additionally, you may create and / or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.One (1) of the main functions of any business is to transform data into information. The use of relational databases has gained recognition as a standard for organizations and business transactions. A quality database design makes the flow of data seamless. The database schema is the foundation of the relational database. The schema defines the tables, fields, relationships, views, indexes, and other elements. The schema should be created by envisioning the business, processes, and workflow of the company.
Section 1: Design Document1. Write a five to ten (5-10) page design document in which you:a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Note: The minimum requirement for the schema should entail the tables, fields, relationships, views, and indexes.c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Then, identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved.d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix.f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix.h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD.i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:- This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
- Include charts or diagrams created in MS Visio or Dia as an appendix of the design document. All references to these diagrams must be included in the body of the design document.
Section 2: Revised Gantt Chart / Project PlanUse Microsoft Project or an open source alternative, such as Open Project, to:2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:- Describe the various integrative functions and processes within the information systems area, including databases, systems analysis, security, networking, computer infrastructure, human computer interaction, and Web design.
- Demonstrate the ability to evaluate organizational issues with integrative technological solutions.
- Apply integrative information technology solutions with project management tools to solve business problems.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in information technology.
- Write clearly and concisely about strategic issues and practices in the information technology domain using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.
- By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION
- Create Submission in BlackboardStart Submission
Name: CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design
Description: CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design
| Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS498-PD3-1 1a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. |
| CIS498-PD3-2 1b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
| CIS498-PD3-3 1c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions then identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved. Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys. Did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved. |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Insufficiently identified primary keys and foreign keys. Insufficiently explained how referential integrity will be achieved. |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, explained how referential integrity will be achieved. |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created database tables with appropriate field- naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys. Satisfactorily explained how referential integrity will be achieved. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys. Thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved. |
| CIS498-PD3-4 1d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF). Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). |
Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). |
Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). |
Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). |
Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF). |
| CIS498-PD3-5 1e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
| CIS498-PD3-6 1f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
| CIS498-PD3-7 1g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
| CIS498-PD3-8 1h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD. Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD. |
Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD. |
Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD. |
Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD. |
Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD. |
| CIS498-PD3-9 1i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. |
Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. |
Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. |
Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. |
Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. |
| CIS498-PD3-10 1j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. |
Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. |
Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. |
Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. |
Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. |
| CIS498-PD3-11 2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. Weight: 15% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13.275 (8.85%) Did not submit or incompletely updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15.525 (10.35%) Insufficiently updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. |
Points Range:15.75 (10.50%) – 17.775 (11.85%) Partially updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. |
Points Range:18 (12.00%) – 20.025 (13.35%) Satisfactorily updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. |
Points Range:20.25 (13.50%) – 22.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. |
| CIS498-PD3-12 3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) More than 8 errors present |
Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) 7-8 errors present |
Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) 5-6 errors present |
Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) 3-4 errors present |
Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) 0-2 errors present |
Name:CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design
Description:CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design
0 comments