Please provide a well-thought-out and detailed response to this philosophy of science question. base the answer on these sources only please:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-ar..
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6452178_What_is_wrong_with_intelligent_design
Please evaluate the following argument, by briefly explaining whether each of its premises (1., 2, and 3.) are true. Dawkins and Sober disagree about the truth of premises 1. and 2. You should explain what they say in defense of their respective views. In describing what it means for evidence to support a hypothesis, make sure to use the Law of Likelihood. In evaluating premise 3., keep in mind the distinction between evidential reasons and prudential reasons.
- The biological version of the design argument as articulated by Paley, before Darwin, provided evidence for the existence of an intelligent designer.
- But Darwin’s theory of evolution undermines this argument.
- If Darwin’s theory of evolution undermines the biological version of the design argument, then there is no reason to believe that God exists.
- Therefore, there is no reason to believe that God exists
0 comments