Check the rubric to see what counts as a “substantive reply”
Be aware: Canvas doesn’t let me set a new deadline for the responses, so Canvas will automatically consider your responses “late”–don’t worry though, I don’t care about that.
Discussion Prompt (200-300 words)
Thesis (defend, challenge, or qualify): To improve Post-Truth society, should we treat the average person (“the herd”) with a “pathos of distance”?
If yes, use Nietzsche’s arguments from the Genealogy of Morals to support your reasoning. Why might this strategy be especially helpful for resolving Post-Truth problems?
If not, use critiques from the Week 13b lecture to propose an alternative. Why might this alternative be especially helpful for resolving Post-Truth problems?
All responses must analyze one short passage from the “Third Essay” of the Genealogy of Morals. [Cite the section number for the passage–for example, “passage passage passage” (Section 8).]
Don’t forget to post your word count at the end!
READING:
Nietzsche, GM, Read the “Third Essay” (You are encouraged to read the entire chapter, but it’s very long. If you don’t have time, thenread sections 1, 6-16, 23, 28)
0 comments