Present your approved intervention to the patient,
INTRODUCTION
Reflect on their contributions to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences.
For this assessment, you’ll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and reflect on various aspects of your experience. Such reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal practice.
REQUIREMENTS
The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for supporting evidence.
- Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.
- Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.
- Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.
- Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.
- Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.
- Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.
- Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.
- Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.
- Note specific observations related to the nurse’s role in policy implementation and development.
- Explain whether the project outcomes matched your initial predictions.
- Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.
- Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.
- Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.
- Assess your personal and professional growth .
- Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.
- Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.
COMPETENCIES MEASURED
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
- Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.
- Describe one’s use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement project.
- Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.
- Explain whether project outcomes matched one’s initial predictions and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
- Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.
- Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in the project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.(case study)
- Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.
- Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.
- Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.
- Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.
- Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
- Assess one’s personal and professional growth throughout the project
Use the Intervention this Feedback Form as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention. You’ll include the feedback as part of your script.
Intervention Feedback Form
Assessment 4
it’s simply a guide to help you capture patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention.
4. Describe the problem you were addressing.
5. Why was this a problem for the patient, family, or group?
6. What was your intervention?
7. How will the patient, family, or group apply the intervention?
8. How often will the intervention be used and under what circumstances?
9. How easy was it for the patient, family, or group to use the intervention?
10. Describe any challenges associated with the patient, family, or group’s use of the
intervention.
11. Were instructions necessary?
12. What did the patient, family, or group say about using the intervention?
13. Was the intervention helpful?
14. How will the patient, family, or group continue to use the intervention?
15. Explain how the intervention positively or negatively affected the patient, family, or
group’s life.
16. How can the effect be measured?
The patient is a 65 years old female , the patient has morbid obesity which is characterized by a BMI of above 35.0. and has had this obesity for more than 20 years, which has contributed to the development of other health issues like CHF,DMII, Osteoarthritis, Dyslipidemia and Hypertension. The patient has been living with family for years but with her health progressively deteriorating she had to spend some time at hospitals and rehab facilities.
Scoring Guide
1. Assesses the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life. The assessment is fair, unbiased, and supported by feedback from the patient, family, or group.
2. Succinctly describes one’s use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project. Project planning and implementation clearly reflect the influence of evidence-based practice
3. Presents an articulate assessment of the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group. Offers keen insight into prospective improvements in health care technology use.
4.Presents an articulate assessment of how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of project, as well as on any contributions the project made to policy development. Offers keen insight into the nurse’s role in policy implementation and development.
5.Provides an articulate and perceptive explanation of whether project outcomes matched one’s initial predictions. Exhibits clear insight into the generalizability and best-practice potential of the intervention.
6.Objectively assesses one’s personal and professional growth throughout project and . Provides a comprehensive and detailed retrospective of one’s overall performance and growth
0 comments