Reply:
What is your search strategy?
Literature reviews are very beneficial in Public health research because the information provides up-to-date reviews on specific topics related to Public health professionals’ fields (“Literature reviews | SPH,” 2021). In addition, the reviews are used to find gaps in research and ideas for advancing research for the future. The focus of my research will be on the prevalence of Cardiovascular disease and hypertension among minority populations. The strategy is to gather information through the many public health database resources such as PubMed-National Institutes of Health, The World Health Organization, Center for Disease Control, Mayo Clinic, and heart disease resources and scholarly journals. Once I have enough data on the causes, statistics, challenges, and preventative methods of (CVD) and hypertension I will then formulate results, discussions, and awareness on what has been found from my research. Moreover, key terms and search words I will use for my research will include, heart condition, stroke symptoms, elevated heart rate, Vital-sings, morning hypertension, and complication (Wang et al., 2017).
Use of Boolean operators
Boolean operators are used to adding words or separate keywords in a search engine. I use Boolean operators all the time, especially when searching for specific topics when using the Grand Canyon University Library. Booleans are very helpful and allow me to receive specific information on the topic I am searching for. I will use Boolean operators (AND, OR, and NOT), when connecting several pieces of information for a certain topic, to connect similar concepts, and to narrow searches.
References
Literature reviews | SPH. (2021). Boston University. https://www.bu.edu/sph/students/student-services/s…
Wang, J., Shi, X., Ma, C., Zheng, H., Xiao, J., Bian, H., … & Gong, L. (2017). Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of hypertension, 35(1), 10-17.
Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
- Ask a probing question.
- Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
- Offer and support an opinion.
- Validate an idea with your own experience.
- Make a suggestion.
- Expand on your colleague’s posting.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
0 comments