- Review the Power Point Natural Law from Assignment 1. (Note: Sea Gulls v. Canadian Geese)
- Review the notes above on Negative and Positive Liberty.
- Review the following articles:
- Two Concepts of Liberty by Isaiah Berlin http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/fileadmin/wiso_vwl/johannes/Ankuendigungen/Berlin_twoconceptsofliberty.pdf. (Isaiah Berlin is thought by many to be the dominant scholar of his generation)
- And in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Positive and Negative Liberty” http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/
- Use the above list of government restrictions on individual liberty to assess how you perceive liberty.
- Write a One-page Response discussing your position on Positive v. Negative Liberty – Does it matter? Include in your response your thoughts on liberty as it defines a particular view of what is permissible for the state to do, and in establishing what the state exists to do in the name of governing.
if powerpoint is needed please let me know
review notes .
| Liberty |
|
The Founding Fathers embraced a view of human nature embodied in the Constitution. They believed men will seek power, and this view was largely forged in their belief that politicians tended to be corrupt. The English constitution did not adequately protect the rights of Englishmen. The liberties colonists fought for were ones they believed were widely understood and were embodied in Higher Law. These were the Natural Rights of man. (See Power Point: Natural Law) |
| Positive v. Negative Liberty — Does it Matter? |
|
There is considerable debate about the distinction between negative and positive liberty. It matters because each defines a different view of what is permissible for the state to do, and in establishing what the state exists to do in the name of governing. Negative Liberty means “freedom from” (absence of constraints or the interference of government)
Positive Liberty means “capacity to” (freedom and ability to pursue one’s goals with government)
Positive Liberty means that in order to give some people what they want to have, government must take those resources from others. This is a violation of the citizen’s negative liberty. Who determines what people need to be given—who decides the necessities of life? Traditionally, Americans define social welfare as help for those who through no fault of their own deserve assistance. How do you view liberty in these examples?
|


0 comments