MNG03217: Assessment 2 – Group Essay 30%
TASK:
GROUP-WORK (3000 words): In teams of three to four people, select three (3) leaders to examine (two from text book, and the third may be from the text or another leader of your choosing). As a group, research, evaluate and write an essay on the leaders selected (1000 words each) addressing the following questions:
What kind of leader is the individual?
Describe the individual’s leadership style
Describe the individual’s communication style
Is this leader ethical? Why or why not?
Do you respect him or her? Why or why not?
How effective do you consider the leader to be or to have been? Explain why you answered the way you did.
INDIVIDUAL-FEEDBACK (500 words): As individuals, provide feedback on the group-work process addressing the following questions:
How well did your team work together?
What were the pros and cons of working as a team on this project?
How would the outcome have differed had this been an individual assignment?
How did what you have learned about teams and teamwork shape your understanding of this project?
This assignment will account for 30% of your grade and will be due at the end of Week 10 (Friday August 29, 6:00 pm). Unless there are unusual circumstances, all members of the team will receive the same grade. Grading criteria include the clarity and depth of your writing and the extent to which the content areas described above are covered fully.
WORD COUNT:
Group-work (3000 words)
Individual-feedback (500 words)
FORMAT:
Essay
REFERENCING:
Use Harvard Referencing Style.
Provide minimum of three (3) credible references per leader. Use journal article or books if you can, otherwise use legitimate and credible websites. Useful sources are provided in “Libguide” topics.
SUBMISSION:
Attach Assignment Cover Sheet listing names of all contributing team members to document.
Include each team member’s feedback (with names attached) as addendums to the essay.
Submit via TURNITIN link.
DUE DATE: Week 10, August 29 by 6:00 pm.
MNG03217: Assessment 2 – Group Essay 30%
Marking Criteria
MNG03217: Assessment 2 – Group Essay 30%
NAME: Student ID:
Marking Criterion NSPCDHD
Comprehension: (10)
Demonstrates understanding of assessment task.
Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of:
leadership ethics
evolution of leadership
multicultural leadership
leadership theories
psychology of leadership
Analysis: (10)
Identifies, explains and assesses communication and leadership styles of selected individuals.
Analyses, discusses and assesses selected leaders in terms of:
leadership ethics
evolution of leadership
multicultural leadership
leadership theories
psychology of leadership
Demonstrates clear and coherent argument for effectiveness of selected leaders.
Presentation: (5)
Times New Roman font, 12 point font-size, 1.5 or double-spaced line spacing, 2.54 cm margins and 1 line spacing between paragraphs.
Within +/– 10% of word limit.
Demonstrates clear and coherent writing style in third person perspective.
Demonstrates detailed attention to essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Provides minimum three (3) references per leader.
Sources may be cited in-text multiple times but the List of References must have at least nine distinct sources.
Provides correct in-text referencing and List of References in Harvard style.
Group-work Feedback: (5)
Provides clear and considered feedback.
Demonstrates self-awareness.
Reflects on role of teams and teamwork in understanding and accomplishing task.
Grade:
Comment:
0 comments