I don’t know how to handle this Writing question and need guidance.
1.Why does the AHR article state that Hannah-Jones’ “may be guilty of overstatement” rather than factually incorrect, as her critics claim?
2. Longer answer: 1 to 2 fully fleshed out paragraphs.
Eller uses the case of terrorism to discuss how the differing disciplines address the topic. I want you to pick two of the three disciplines (history, politics, economics) and discuss where/how these two disciplines overlap and differ in their approach to terrorism.
3. This is a freebie of sorts. I want you to use this question to tell me what you want to know about the social world. What facets or topic would you like to know more about. You need to give me some insight here and I’ll work to incorporate the most common (and/or most pressing) ideas into the readings on interdisciplinarity. Note: if you do not write something here, you forfeit these points.
0 comments