I need this done by 2pm MST on Saturday the 15th.
Please review everything below including the grading rubric.
APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited.
Textbook for the course:Miller, R. L. (2017). Business law today: The essentials: Text and summarized cases (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9781305574793
Option #1: Lifetime Employability
In your career development work to date, you have researched careers that interest you, and you have evaluated your strengths and weaknesses, comparing them to those required in the career you want. You may have worked with a mentor or networked with other professionals working in your desired career, and you are developing a resume and honing your interviewing skills. Soon you will apply what you are learning to your job search. This is a good time to also consider the skills and practices required for on-the-job success.
Note: If you wish to use a mentor who does not fit the above description, you must secure your instructor’s approval in writing before completing this project; send the individual’s name, title, and credentials to your instructor with a written request for an exception.
All careers are influenced by employment and business laws that affect hiring, employability, on-the-job behaviors, or termination. To complete this assignment, refer to your personal experience with business laws, acts, ordinances, or your anticipated/desired experiences and how employment and business laws affect you and your specific industry. You can also refer to information in the Student Career Center.
In the Student Career Center (Links to an external site.), read Tips for Professional Success (Links to an external site.). Using a single example or multiple examples from your professional life now and/or in the past, or from your research, answer the following questions in a well-written paper. Be sure to provide detailed responses to these questions using specific examples and integrate your answers into a paper that flows smoothly.
Develop a well-written two- to three-page paper, not including the title or references pages, that includes the following:
- Describe how domestic employment and business law will affect/impact you and the industry you are—or will be—working in.
- Explain how you use critical thinking in decision making and problem-solving in your professional life.
- Define the three most important elements of personal and professional etiquette that you employ in your professional life.
- Create a personal ethics philosophy with regard to business or your field of choice. Explain how you would apply this philosophy in your daily life.
- Outline your communication strengths in your professional life. Describe your weaknesses.
- List the strategies you employ to stay on task and on time in your professional life. Explain how you manage your professional goals.
- Use a minimum of three supporting references with at least one or two of those being peer-reviewed. These sources could relate to goal setting, professional goals, professional etiquette, decision making, or any other relevant aspect of career development.
Always follow the APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
MGT315 Mod 1 CT
MGT315 Mod 1 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCareer Development Content
|
| 10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of career center opportunities and tools to assist employment skills and applicable knowledge of business careers, especially those with a business law background. Suggests several opportunities for growth and lifetime employability.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the quality opportunities the career center provides. Includes several opportunities and tools to assist employment skills and applicable knowledge of business careers, especially those with a business law background. Suggests some opportunities for growth and lifetime employability.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the quality opportunities the career center provides. Includes some opportunities and tools to assist employment skills or applicable knowledge of business careers, especially those with a business law background. Suggests a few opportunities for growth and lifetime employability.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the quality opportunities the career center provides. Few opportunities and tools are identified to assist employment skills or applicable knowledge of business careers, especially those with a business law background. Does not suggest any opportunities for growth and lifetime employability.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The paper/memo includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The paper/memo includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
The paper/memo includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The paper/memo includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of personal strategies for decision making, professional etiquette, ethical behavior, communication, goal setting, and applicable employment opportunities and educational requirements.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Demonstrates developing or adequate critical analysis of personal strategies for decision making, professional etiquette, ethical behavior, communication, goal setting, and applicable employment opportunities and educational requirements.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major gaps or critical analysis of personal strategies for decision making, professional etiquette, ethical behavior, communication, goal setting, and applicable employment opportunities and educational requirements.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide any personal strategies for decision making, professional etiquette, ethical behavior, communication, goal setting, and applicable employment opportunities and educational requirements.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
|
| 10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of how personal experiences apply in planning for on-the-job success. A thoughtful plan for growth and development within their field of study and content application is provided.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions of how personal experiences apply in planning for on-the-job success. A well-structured plan for growth and development within their field of study and content application is provided.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions of how personal experiences apply in planning for on-the-job success. An underdeveloped plan for growth and development within their field of study and content application is provided.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate how personal experiences apply in planning for on-the-job success. No plan for growth and development within their field of study or content application is provided.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
|
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 50
|
0 comments