I’m working on a writing multi-part question and need guidance to help me understand better.
1. Wright presents a synopsis of both National League of Cities v Usery and Garcia v San Antonio Metropolitan Authority. Which of Wright’s models does each case represent?
2. Which of Wright’s models best characterizes modern-day federalism? Or do we see all models at work depending on specific policies?
3. What does Dethick mean by the paradox of the middle tier and how might this paradox affect your ability to implement a program?
4. If traditional federalism is gone as Rubin suggests, why do we cling to the notion that states are still sovereign? Again, what are the implications of this tension for implementation and evaluation of programs and policies?
0 comments