This is the article I would like you to write critically on.
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169-1180
An important skill for doctoral students is how to critically evaluate research. Do not summarize the reading in your paper, nor the methodology or the results. Rather, write your reaction to and analysis of some aspect of the reading and how it may be applied in your field.
Things to consider when writing the paper:
General – Is the article clear and organized or are some of the points confusing or ambiguous? Do the authors include terms and concepts without explaining them clearly?
Methodology – Is the methodology flawed or is it appropriate for the research question(s)? Any modification to improve it? Were the instruments/stimuli used appropriate? Should the researchers have used other stimuli or add to the ones used?
Participants – Any issues with the participants (e.g., not representative of the population it purports to study, small sample size. gender and age issues)?
Results, Conclusions, Application – Are there additional implications of the results that the author(s) did not mention? Any issues with generalizing the results? Would you apply the results of the study in your field? Any limitations that should have been considered? What are future directions that have not been discussed but you feel are important to include in the paper?
0 comments