• Home
  • Blog
  • Managing special hazards- Asbestos and lead contanimation

Managing special hazards- Asbestos and lead contanimation

0 comments

Managing Special Hazards

Scenario

You have just been hired as a National Laboratory’s Environmental, Health, and Safety Manager. You were pleased to see that the previous manager had disposed of nearly all of the wastes stored in the hazardous waste facility but noticed that there was an adjacent shed with a sign that read “Do Not Enter – Authorized Personnel Only.” You also noticed that the door was cracked open and upon shining a light inside, you saw:

  1. A cardboard box labeled “Asbestos (friable) – Insulation.”
  2. A large wooden box labeled “Portable Gauge, Cesium-137.”
  3. A 55-gallon drum labeled “Paint Chips – Pb.”

As you moved away from the door, you saw two large containers on the grass on the side of the shed:

  1. A 55-gallon drum labeled “PCB Transformers” (with obvious corrosion and oily liquid saturating the ground adjacent to the drum).
  2. An old 20-gallon plastic container marked “Pesticides – ???? unknown” (with obvious spillage on the ground).

A day after taking photos of these five items and emailing them to your boss, you get a voicemail from your boss asking you to meet her and the lab director the following week to present a plan to identify and dispose of these items and any contaminated soil adjacent to the shed.

Assignment

Your Task: To ultimately dispose of these five items, describe (for each) how you would determine the physical, chemical, or radiological properties of the items in sufficient detail to assess their hazard level (toxicity, etc.) so that they can be accepted by a licensed disposal facility.

Note: You should be able to identify specific methods (chemical analysis, survey meters/instrumentation, monitoring devices, etc.). Provide URL links to commercial vendors that can provide testing, analysis, and instrumentation in the above identification.

Your response should be in APA format including a title page and a reference page. An abstract is not required for this assignment. The body of your paper (not including title or reference page) should be approximately 2-3 pages.

SFTY 580 5.3 Writing Assignment Rubric

SFTY 580 5.3 Writing Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjectives (accomplishes goals and objectives of assignment and completes assignment requirements)

30.0 pts

Superior 28-30 | Submission thoroughly addresses all aspects of the assignment requirements.

27.0 pts

Excellent 25-27 | Submission meets most aspects of the assignment requirements.

24.0 pts

Good 21-24 | Submission meets some of the assignment requirements.

20.0 pts

Fair 17-20 | Submission minimally meets assignment requirements.

16.0 pts

Poor 0-16 | Submission fails to meet assigned requirements and does not address goals and objectives of the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch (consider scholarly literature for sources of data and references)

20.0 pts

Superior 19-20 | Submission provides excellent evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

18.0 pts

Excellent 17-18 | Submission provides significant evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

16.0 pts

Good 15-16 | Submission provides logical evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

14.0 pts

Fair 13-14 | Submission provides minimal evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

12.0 pts

Poor 0-12 | Submission fails to provide, or does not show evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thought (consider evaluation of previous research and data and demonstrates critical thinking)

20.0 pts

Superior 19-20 | Submission thoroughly demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

18.0 pts

Excellent 17-18 | Submission significantly demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

16.0 pts

Good 15-16 | Submission logically demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

14.0 pts

Fair 13-14 | Submission minimally demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.

12.0 pts

Poor 0-12 | Submission fails to demonstrate the application of critical thought that support Submission conclusions.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, and Writing Style

15.0 pts

Superior 14-15 | All aspects of the submission illustrates correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

13.0 pts

Excellent 12-13 | Most of the submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

11.0 pts

Good 10-11 | Some or most of the Submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

9.0 pts

Fair 7-9 | Some of the Submission shows correct grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

6.0 pts

Poor 0-6 | Submission fails to meet, or does not display correct use of grammar, punctuation, and writing style.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format

15.0 pts

Superior 14-15 | Submission exhibits excellent compliance with proper APA format.

13.0 pts

Excellent 12-13 | Submission exhibits significant compliance with proper APA format.

11.0 pts

Good 10-11 | Submission exhibits some compliance with proper APA format.

9.0 pts

Fair 7-9 | Submission exhibits minimal compliance with proper APA format.

6.0 pts

Poor 0-6 | Submission fails to present or does not follow a proper APA format.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}