• Home
  • Blog
  • LGST 201 UMGC Synthesis of Rationales and the IRAC Method Questions

LGST 201 UMGC Synthesis of Rationales and the IRAC Method Questions

0 comments

Part 1:

Background: You and the paralegal team have been working diligently on the Hastings case for eight weeks. Attorney Chong wants you to reflect on this work and what you have learned the past eight weeks, to self-evaluate your legal writing skills, and how you can continue to improve these legal writing skills in the future.

Respond to each of the following in one paragraph.

a. What is the most significant thing you have learned in the past eight weeks about legal writing that you can carry forward in the future and why?

b. There are many important ways to improve legal writing. In Overview, the brief article, “Legal Writing for Paralegals: 3 Ways to Improve Your Writing”, suggests three ways to improve legal writing.

Which of the three tips for improving legal writing, do you think is perhaps most important for paralegals to apply to their legal writing, and why?

c. For you personally, what is the most challenging aspect of legal writing, and why?

Label responses.

Part 2:

React to two colleagues’ comments.

Write in correct, complete sentences in paragraph format, unless instructed otherwise.

Use Arial or Times Roman, size 12 font.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}