Instructions
This assignment will provide you the opportunity to explore the weight scoring method of project selection and ranking among alternatives and also making decisions on how to decide a favourable project from cash flow point of view.
The Quantum Leap Company has set up a weighted scoring matrix for evaluation of potential projects. Below are five projects under consideration.
- Using the scoring matrix below, which project would you rate highest? Lowest?
- If the weight for “Strong Sponsor” is changed from 2.0 to 5.0, will the project selection change? What are the three highest weighted project scores with this new weight?
- Why is it important that the weights mirror critical strategic factors?
- Two new software projects are proposed to a young, start-up company. The Alpha project will cost $150,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $40,000. The Beta project will cost $200,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $50,000. The company is very concerned about their cash flow. Using the payback period, which project is better from a cash flow standpoint? Why?
- Assume that the rate of inflation is 6%, use the Net Present Value (NPV), approach to calculate the payback period for both projects. Which project would you now recommend? Why?
- In your estimation, which approach to calculating payback period is better? Explain your response, giving the pros and cons of each approach.
| Criteria | Strong Sponsor | Support Business Strategy | Urgency | Sale From new Products | Competition | Fill Market Gap | Weighted Total (a) | Weighted total (b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Project 1 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Project 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Project 3 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Project 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Project 5 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 0 |


0 comments