|
Criteria 1
|
Exceeds Expectations 5 points
|
Meets Expectations 4 points
|
Meets Some Expectations 3 points
|
Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points
|
Not Included 0 points
|
|
Organization
(maximum of 5 points)
|
Arranges ideas clearly and logically to support the purpose or argument; ideas flow smoothly and are effectively linked; reader can follow the line of reasoning
|
Arranges ideas adequately to support the purpose or argument; links between ideas are generally clear; reader can follow the line of reasoning for the most part
|
Arranges ideas adequately, in general, although ideas sometimes fail to make sense together; reader remains fairly clear about what writer intends
|
Arranges ideas illogically; ideas frequently fail to make sense together; reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and becomes frustrated or loses interest
|
|
|
Criteria 3
|
Exceeds Expectations 15 points
|
Meets Expectations 12 points
|
Meets Some Expectations 9 points
|
Does Not Meet Expectations 4 points
|
Not Included 0 points
|
|
Content
(maximum of 15 points)
|
Gives very specific information. Addressed all of the assignment components. Clearly illustrates critical and reflective thinking. Well thought-out response.
|
Contains specific information. Addressed all of the assignment components. Is relatively detailed. Shows some critical and reflective thinking. Relatively well thought-out response.
|
Has some specific information. Addressed many of the assignment components. Not detailed. Poorly thought-out response.
|
Is vague and does not address all assignment components. No evidence of having given the assignment real thought.
|
|
|
Criteria 3
|
Exceeds Expectations 5 points
|
Meets Expectations 4 points
|
Meets Some Expectations 3 points
|
Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points
|
Not Included 0 points
|
|
Mechanics, references and APA
|
Execution is excellent. No grammar or writing errors. Reads easily. Is well organized. Includes two additional scholarly, relevant sources.
|
Well executed. Few grammar or writing errors. Reads easily. Is fairly well organized. Sources are either not all scholarly or not all relevant.
|
Execution is poor. Many grammar or writing errors. Hard to read. Poorly organized.
|
Falls short of the required length for the assignment. Very poorly written. Very difficult to read. No organization is evident. Reads like a last minute effort.
|
|
0 comments