Kramer vs. Kramer Assignment

0 comments

LAW2240  Family Law                                              Kramer vs. Kramer Assignment

https://digitalcampus-swankmp-net.ezproxy.library.berkeley.org/berkeleycollege/play/6e52bcd21de1f6fc?referrer=direct

Kramer vs. Kramer is a 1979 drama about a child custody battle and issues concerning divorce as it relates to children.Millions of children’s lives each year will be impacted by divorce.  Many of those children will find themselves at the center of a custody lawsuit being torn between two parents they love and having to face the challenges and insecurities divorce oftentimes creates.

For this assignment, you are to watch the film Kramer vs. Kramer and carefully review the material in chapter 9 of the eText.  I have provided a link to the movie in the Course Information module.  You are to write a 5 page, double-spaced, 12 font, paper discussing the following legal issues presented in the film:

  1. What are the different types of custody a court can award and explain each?

Years ago the courts presumed that a young child was better off with the mother unless it was proven that the mother was unfit.  This doctrine was referred to as the tender years doctrine and was used by the court in deciding the custody dispute between the Kramers.

  • Do you agree with this doctrine? Why or why not?
  • What standard does the court use today in determining which biological parent should get custody and what factors are considered?
  • Why, in Kramer vs. Kramer, did the court not award joint custody? In what types of situations is joint custody most successful?

The judge in the Kramer case makes a ruling without ever having interviewed the child.

  • Do you think a judge should speak with a child concerning the relationship of the child with his or parents?
  • Why do you think it would be important to interview the child?
  • What problems do you foresee in speaking with the child?
  • Should the age of the child make a difference?

Assume you were an attorney and trying the Kramer case today.

  • What party, the mother or father, would you prefer to represent?
  • What arguments would you make on behalf of your client to convince the judge that your client should be awarded custody?
  • In your opinion, did the trial depicted in Kramer vs. Kramer accurately reflect the way courts today would treat custody cases?

This paper is due by the end of Week 5 (Saturday @ 11:59 pm EST) and must be typed.  This paper should be in essay form and not question/answer format.  If outside resources are used, including the eText, proper citations and works cited page must be included.  Please refer to the APA Guidelines located in Course Information.  Please submit this assignment through the Week 5 Assignment module.  Late assignments and assignments not submitted through the Week 5 Assignment module will not be accepted.

Kramer vs. Kramer Grading Rubric

 Below is the grading rubric I will be using to grade the Kramer vs. Kramer assignment.  Carefully review it so you are aware of the point distribution when I score your papers.

Kramer v. Kramer Grading Rubric

Rubric

Kramer v. Kramer Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Introductory Paragraph (10 points)10.0 pts Excellent A strong intro that is clear, concise and powerful. Grabs the readers’ attention. 7.0 pts Satisfactory Has an intro but does not draw the reader in and not overly compelling. 4.0 pts Needs Improvement Intro is either vague or lacking. Needs to be more engaging.10.0 pts
Thesis (10 points)10.0 pts Excellent Answers the questions presented and makes a strong assertion. Goes beyond the predictable. 7.0 pts Satisfactory Answers most of the questions presented. Demonstrates some insight into the topic but the assertion is weak. 4.0 pts Needs Improvement Answers few questions presented and displays confusion about the topics or simplistic thinking.10.0 pts
Commentary and Legal Analysis (40 points)40.0 pts Excellent Original commentary that provokes thought and clearly reflects the author’s voice. Supports position with examples and analysis. Identifies all legal issues presented. 30.0 pts Satisfactory Commentary is vague and/or underdeveloped. Language is adequate but does not reflect author’s voice. Some but not all legal issues are identified. 20.0 pts Needs Improvement Commentary is disconnected or underdeveloped. Analysis is lacking and language is vague. Fails to address many of the legal issues.40.0 pts
Concluding Paragraph (10 points)10.0 pts Excellent Has a strong and clearly stated concluding paragraph that connects to the positions taken. 7.0 pts Satisfactory Has a concluding paragraph but shows no connection to the positions taken and not clearly stated. 4.0 pts Needs Improvement Lacks a concluding paragraph or conclusion is unclear and not related to the positions taken. Overly simplistic.10.0 pts
Writing/Organization (30 points)30.0 pts Excellent The paper is well organized and the writing is clear and concise. There is no more than 1 spelling or grammatical error. Proofreading is evident. 20.0 pts Satisfactory The paper is generally well organized and easy to follow. Writing is mostly clear but may lack conciseness. There are only a few spelling and/or grammatical errors. 10.0 pts Needs Improvement Paper is poorly organized and difficult to read. Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. There are numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors.30.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
https://digitalcampus-swankmp-net.ezproxy.library.berkeley.org/berkeleycollege/play/6e52bcd21de1f6fc?referrer=direct

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}