KLF Case Study

0 comments

  • 12pt Times New Roman font, single spaced.
  • The report should be 12 to 15 pages in length.
  1. Regional distributors are currently using continuous review inventory policy. Compute and describe their inventory management policy and associated cost. Ignore inbound and outbound transportation cost. Provide answers and calculations for order quantity, demand during lead time, safety stock, average inventory level, inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week.
  2. Suppose five regional warehouses are replaced by single, centralized warehouse as shown in figure 1b.
    1. Assuming that warehouse is using continuous review inventory policy, compute and describe its inventory management policy and associated cost. Ignore inbound and outbound transportation cost. Provide answers and calculations for order quantity, demand during lead time, safety stock, average inventory level, inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week.
    2. Compare ordering, holding, and total cost of maintaining a single, centralized warehouse versus maintaining five regional warehouses. Has cost increased or decreased? Will you always observe similar results? Explain.
  3. KLF Electronics is evaluating the potential for implementing periodic review inventory policy; however, their primary concern is lowering costs without compromising service quality.
    1. Assuming that the time between orders (review period r) remains the same for each regional warehouse, compute and describe its inventory management policy and associated cost using the current distribution system (Figure 1a). Ignore inbound and outbound transportation cost. Provide answers and calculations for Base stock, safety stock, average inventory level, inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week. Compare with your answers to question 1, and report percentage change in inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week for maintaining all the five regional warehouses. Comment on your findings.
    2. Redo similar analysis for the case of a single, centralized warehouse. Compare with your answers to question 2, and report on percentage change in inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week. Comment on your findings.
  4. Suppose a new, centralized warehouse is added to serve Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, and Dallas as shown in Figure 1c. The manufacturing facility will continue to serve the Los Angles warehouse given its proximity and newly added centralized warehouse. Assuming that all warehouses are following the continuous review inventory policy, compute and describe its inventory management policy and associated cost. Keep in mind that the centralized warehouse is one echelon above regional warehouses. Ignore inbound and outbound transportation cost. Provide answers and calculations for order quantity, demand during lead time, safety stock, average inventory level, inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and total cost per week. Compare ordering, holding, and total cost of this distribution system with your answers to questions 1 and 2. Which distribution system has the lowest cost out of all three described? Comment on your findings.
  5. Now consider transportation cost associated with each distribution strategy.
    1. For the distribution system given in figure 1a, compute inbound and outbound transportation cost. Add these costs to total cost obtained in response to Question 1.
    2. For the distribution system given in figure 1b, determine which regional warehouse, if made the central warehouse, will have the lowest transportation cost. Add these costs to total cost obtained in response to Question 2.
    3. For the distribution system given in figure 1c, compute inbound, intermediate (inbound to Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, & Dallas warehouses,) and outbound transportation cost. Add these costs to total cost obtained in response to Question 4.
    4. Which distribution system has the lowest total cost out of all the three options described? Comment on your findings.
  6. KLF Electronics is looking into finding new, centralized warehouse that would serve Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, and Dallas warehouses as shown in Figure 1c. Perform internet search and find coordinates for Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, and Dallas. Apply the centroid method to determine the location of a new, centralized warehouse. Where does this fall on U.S. map? Is this location feasible? What recommendation(s) do you have for the new warehouse? Keep in mind that a slight departure from the actual solution obtained from using the centroid methods does not affect overall results.
  7. What other factors apart from cost should be taken into consideration while selecting a new facility location? Comment on the feasibility of the possible location(s) based on other factors.
  8. Consider all modes of transportation to regional warehouses from a new, centralized warehouse.
    1. 3PL Company has quoted an equivalent price for outbound transportation to all regional warehouses. Is the recommended warehouse equidistant from four cities by highway?
    2. Considering the recommended location, what other modes of transportation apart from highway are possible for shipping products to regional warehouses? Comment on the feasibility of each possible mode of transportation.

Format

  • Use 12pt Times New Roman font, single spaced.
  • The report should be 12 to 15 pages in length.
  • Use the following KLF Report Format.docx.
  • The report should include in-text references with numbers that correspond to a numbered reference list.

Evaluation

Please consult the rubric for this assessment before beginning your work.

SUBMISSION

Submit your completed work for evaluation.

Rubric

KLF Case Study Project Rubric

KLF Case Study Project Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop continuous review inventory policy

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly calculate all inventory terms and the associated costs.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Few calculation errors in the inventory terms or the associated costs.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Many calculation errors and in the inventory numbers and the associated costs. Fails to correctly identify inventory terms and their meanings.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrate effectiveness of principle of risk-pooling

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly calculate all inventory terms and the associated costs. Demonstrate and identify the cost savings when principle of risk-pooling is implemented.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Few calculation errors in the inventory terms or the associated costs.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Many calculation errors and in the inventory numbers and the associated costs. Fails to correctly identify inventory terms and their meanings.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop periodic review inventory policy

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly calculate all inventory terms and the associated costs. Correctly formulate inventory review period. Make appropriate conclusion.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Few calculation errors in the inventory terms or the associated costs. Correctly formulate inventory review period.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Many calculation errors and in the inventory numbers and the associated costs. Fails to correctly identify inventory terms and their meanings. Formulate inventory review period incorrectly.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop multi-echelon inventory policy

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly calculate all inventory terms and the associated costs. Correctly identify two echelon and make appropriate adjustments in lead time.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Few calculation errors in the inventory terms or the associated costs. Either fails to make adjustment in lead time or aggregate demand appropriately.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Many calculation errors and in the inventory numbers and the associated costs. Fails to correctly identify inventory terms and their meanings. Fails to make adjustment in lead time. Fails to aggregate demand appropriately.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate transportation related cost in decision analysis

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly calculate all transportation related costs. Correctly identify regional warehouse to be replaced with central warehouse.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Few calculation errors in transportation related costs.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Many calculation errors and in transportation related costs. Fails to correctly identify transportation cost terms and their relationship.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse quantitative tools for facility location selection

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Identify suitable location on the map for the new facility location. Correctly calculate new facility coordinates using centroid method.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Correctly formulate problem in centroid method.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Unable to find correct coordinates for regional warehouses. Incorrectly formulate problem in centroid method.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze facility location using qualitative factors

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Focuses on the key factors Convincingly Demonstrate how these factors are significant with respect the current problem

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Focuses on some key factors. Reasonably explain how these factors are relevant with respect to the current problem.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Focuses on general or tangential factors Fail to demonstrate how these issues are significant or relevant with respect to current problem.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze different modes of transportation

12.5 pts

Completely Meets Expectations

Correctly identify and describe all the feasible modes of transportation and quote relevant examples from outside resources. Provide convincing recommendation comparing each transportation mode backed by actual statistics with respect to current problem.

10 pts

Partially Meets Expectations

Correctly identify and describe all the feasible modes of transportation available for selected facility. Provide reasonable recommendation comparing each transportation mode with respect to current problem.

7.5 pts

Does Not Meet expectations

Unable to correctly identify or describe all the feasible modes of transportation available for selected facility. Provide general recommendation but fails to convince or fail to relate them to current problem.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSCM_05Apply different techniques and models to plan and manage inventories across supply chains.

threshold: 3.0 pts

5 ptsMastery with Distinction

3 ptsMastery

0 ptsNot Yet Mastered

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSCM_07Apply logistics and distribution techniques in supply chain management.

threshold: 3.0 pts

5 ptsMastery with Distinction

3 ptsMastery

0 ptsNot Yet Mastered

Total Points: 100

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}