|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate Emil’s performance level
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated Emil’s performance level.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate Emil’s performance level.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine Emil’s response to intervention
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Emil is responding adequately to instruction. A rationale is provided.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Emil is responding adequately to instruction. but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly determine whether or not Emil is responding to instruction AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Emil
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Emil.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Emil.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate slope for Hannah
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated slope for Hannah.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly slope for Hannah.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine Hannah’s response to intervention
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Hannah is responding adequately to instruction. A rationale is provided.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Hannah is responding adequately to instruction. but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly determine whether or not Hannah is responding to instruction AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Hannah
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Hannah.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Hannah.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate performance level for Shaunika
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated the performance level for Shaunika.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate the performance level for Shaunika.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate slope for Shaunika
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine Shaunika’s response to intervention
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Shaunika is responding adequately to instruction. A rationale is provided.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Shaunika is responding adequately to instruction. but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly determine whether or not Shaunika is responding to instruction AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Shaunika
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Shaunika.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Shaunika.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate performance level for Kateria
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated the performance level for Kateri.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate the performance level for Kateri.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate slope for Kateri
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated slope for Kateri.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate slope for Kateri.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine Kateri’s response to intervention
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Kateri is responding adequately to instruction. A rationale is provided.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Kateri is responding adequately to instruction. but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly determine whether or not Kateri is responding to instruction AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Kateri
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Kateri.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Kateri.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate Paul’s performance level
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated the performance level for Paul.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate the performance level for Paul.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate slope for Paul
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated slope for Paul.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate slope for Paul.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine Paul’s response to intervention
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Paul is responding adequately to instruction. A rationale is provided.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly determined whether or not Paul is responding adequately to instruction. but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly determine whether or not Paul is responding to instruction AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Paul
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Paul AND provided a rationale.
|
3 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Paul but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Paul AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate Clay’s performance level
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated the performance level for Clay.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate the performance level for Clay.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCalculate Clay’s slope
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly calculated slope for Clay.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly calculate slope for Clay.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTier of instruction recommendation for Clay
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined the correct tier of instruction for Clay.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine the correct tier of instruction for Clay.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetailed response to Clay’s parents to justify his tier placement.
|
| 5 pts
Candidate provided a detailed response to Clay’s parents to justify his tier placement.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not provide a detailed response to Clay’s parents to justify his tier placement.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 110
|
download in a Word document. Remember to complete the assignments for EACH case study in this module. Remember to use the STAR Sheets as they will provide you specific directions on how to complete the assignments for each case study.
0 comments