Due Date: Mar 28, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points: 80
Please read this assignment before you offer handshake
Details:
The three major human resources management responsibilities are: attracting a quality workforce, developing a quality workforce, and maintaining a quality workforce.
Research the RSPS scenario with which you are familiar to identify a need for change.
Based on the Rancho Solano case studied earlier in the course, you have been selected to make changes to the RSPS subsystems most in need of change, as well as make the necessary human resources management decisions to bring about that change. Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper in which you address the following questions:
1 What one major organizational subsystem needs to be changed in RSPS? Justify your choice.
2 How will that subsystem change affect two other subsystems within the organization and how will you realign the total system?
3 How could you ensure the proposed change will satisfy any three stakeholders of RSPS?
4 How should RSPS attract, develop, and maintain the workforce required to bring about your proposed change?
Choose at least one of the following in your discussion about attracting a quality workforce to support the change: human resource planning, recruitment, or selection.
Choose at least one of the following in your discussion about how to develop a quality workforce to support the change: employee orientation, training and development, or performance appraisal.
Choose at least one of the following in your discussion about how to maintain a quality workforce to support the change: career development, work-life balance, compensation and benefits, employee retention and turnover, or labor-management relations.
Integrate a faith/worldview-based** component in the paper and make a clear connection on how it informs your management practices. (** As individuals, we all have a worldview, and that influences our decisions, values, and perceptions. It also affects how we manage people [or think they should be managed.] This requirement relates to your worldview, not of RSPS).
Include at least four academic references for this assignment to support your position. One of them should relate to the company discussed in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THIS IS THE RUBIC PLEASE FOLLOW
Human Resources and Change (Benchmark Assignment)
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
70.0 % Content |
|
|||||
|
15.0 % Determines One Major Organizational Subsystem Requiring Change |
The evaluation does not include changes in one organizational subsystem. |
The evaluation includes changes to one organizational subsystem, but they are incomplete or lack detail. |
The evaluation includes changes to one major organizational subsystem in RSPS. There are some details included to support the changes. |
The evaluation includes changes to one major organizational subsystem in RSPS. The changes include one necessary human resource management decision to bring about change. There is a clear justification to support the changes. |
The evaluation includes changes to one major organizational subsystem in RSPS. The changes include two or more necessary human resource management decisions to bring about change. There is a clear justification to support the changes. |
|
|
10.0 % Identifies the Impact to Two Other Subsystems and Describes How the Total System Will be Realigned (PSC-3.2) |
The evaluation does not identify the impact to other subsystems or a description on realignment. |
The evaluation identifies the impact to other subsystems or a description on realignment, but it is incomplete or lacks detail. |
The evaluation identifies the impact to other subsystems. There is some detail on how the change will affect two other subsystems. The description addresses how the total system will be realigned. |
The evaluation identifies the impact to other subsystems. There is clear evidence on how the change will affect two other subsystems. The description addresses how the total system will be realigned and includes a justification for the realignment. |
The evaluation thoroughly describes the impact to two other subsystems. There is a detailed description on how the change will affect two other subsystems, including supporting evidence. The description addresses how the total system will be realigned and includes a justification for the realignment. |
|
|
15.0 % Identifies the Consequences on Three Stakeholders |
The evaluation does not identify the consequences on multiple stakeholders. |
The evaluation identifies the consequences on multiple stakeholders, but is incomplete or lacks detail. |
The evaluation identifies the consequences on multiple stakeholders, while ensuring the change satisfies the stakeholders. There is some evidence supporting proposed stakeholder’s satisfaction. |
The evaluation identifies the consequences on multiple stakeholders. There is some justification of the consequences to the stakeholders. The description supports ensuring the change satisfies the stakeholders. There is clear justification of stakeholder’s satisfaction. |
The evaluation identifies the consequences on multiple stakeholders. There is thorough justification of the consequences to the stakeholders. The description supports ensuring the change satisfies the stakeholders. There is clear evidence reinforcing stakeholder’s satisfaction. |
|
|
20.0 % Determines How to Attract, Develop, and Maintain a Quality Workforce |
The evaluation does not discuss attracting, developing, or maintain a quality workforce. |
The evaluation includes a description concerning how RSPS should attract, develop, and maintain a quality workforce. The student selected one component to support the change in attracting quality workforce, developing quality workforce, and maintaining quality workforce. |
The evaluation includes a description concerning how RSPS should attract, develop, and maintain a quality workforce. The student selected one component to support the change in attracting quality workforce, developing quality workforce, and maintaining quality workforce and integrates each area. |
The evaluation includes a description concerning how RSPS should attract, develop, and maintain a quality workforce. The student selected one component to support the change in attracting quality workforce, developing quality workforce, and maintaining quality workforce and provides a justification for how to integrate changes in each area. |
The evaluation includes a description concerning how RSPS should attract, develop, and maintain a quality workforce. The student selected one component to support the change in attracting quality workforce, developing quality workforce, and maintaining quality workforce and provides a justification for selecting each component and integrating changes in each area. |
|
|
10.0 % Integrates a Faith/Worldview on Personal Management Practices |
The evaluation does not integrate a faith/worldview-based component that determines how it will inform personal management practices. |
The evaluation integrates a faith/worldview-based component and discusses how it will inform personal management practices, but is incomplete or lacks detail. |
The evaluation integrates a faith/worldview-based component that determines how it will inform personal management practices. This component relates to a personal worldview, not that of RSPS. |
The evaluation integrates a faith/worldview-based component that determines how it will inform personal management practices. There is a clear connection between the faith/worldview and how it will affect management practices. This component relates to a personal worldview, not that of RSPS. |
The evaluation integrates a faith/worldview-based component that determines how it will inform personal management practices, including decisions, values, and perceptions. There is a clear connection between the faith/worldview and how it will affect management practices. This component relates to a personal worldview, not that of RSPS. |
|
|
20.0 % Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
|
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. |
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
10.0 % Format |
|
|||||
|
10.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|||||
0 comments