1.Prompt: Some historians argue that Reconstruction was a “recycled form of slavery.” Do you agree with this?
WATCH THE VIDEOS
then answer the question and remember to follow all discussion guidelines per the syllabus.
- 10 points: The discussion posting demonstrates excellent understanding of the material by completely answering the entire discussion question, and considers the implications of the question. Posting gives thoughtful analysis. Posting has excellent synthesis of material with proper citation where appropriate.
- 8-9 points: Posting demonstrates an above average understanding of the material by completely answering entire discussion question. The posting gives good analysis. Posting attempts to synthesize materialwith proper citation where appropriate.
- 6-7 points: Discussion posting only answers the question by doing the bare minimum required. Offers little to no analysis.
- 4-5 points: Discussion posting is below average. Does not meet the minimum requirements. No analysis, nor synthesis.
- 1-3 points: Posting is an attempt to merely complete the assignment. Summation or regurgitation ofthe reading and/or other students’ posts.
2.write a comment to the following paragraph(no more than 100words)
- to some degrees, I agree with this opinion.The biggest reason why I hold the same idea is that, although legal slavery was finally banned during the Reconstruction, the “form of slavery” still existed in the society. The difference is, it has another name called labor. Especially after Lincoln’s death, the whole game seems to changed dramatically. As many African American, or Blacks, were freed because of the emancipation, many of them were still seeking lives as a wage labor working for employers, often their former enslavers. A significant point I say the Reconstruction was a “recycled form of slavery” was how the Blacks were treated. Even when they were supposed to work for specific work, for example, washing, most of the whites employers then still considered them as paid labors. This example is fully described in the text about how a washerwomen was treated no difference than a slave because the one who employed her thought she was paid for “a day’s labor, not just the load of washing”.Meanwhile, those wage labors were still suffering from “the surveillance of white women and the sexual threat posed by white men”. Even they were “free” by law, their society status still hasn’t change much — they were still heavily discriminated.Even after the end of the Reconstruction, the situation was still not as ideal as Lincoln’s thoughts. Of course, there were many movements and reformations in the process, so that their rights were guaranteed a little much than before. However, the complete end of “slavery” still has a long way to go even when it was legally abolished.


0 comments