I don’t know how to handle this Management question and need guidance.
You are negotiating a new labor contract with union officials. The contract covers a plant that has
experienced operating losses over the past several years. You want to negotiate concessions from labor to reduce the losses. However, labor is refusing any compromises. You could tell them that, without concessions, the plant will be closed, although that is not true.
Is bluffing ethical? Under what circumstances? What would Kant and Mill say? What would be the
result under the Front Page testtes Discussion 2 (250 words)
Consider the doctrine of stare decisis. Should courts follow past rulings, or should they decide cases anew each time, without regard to past decisions?
0 comments