D. COMPARISON OF EXPERIENCES TO RESEARCH (~2pages): This is a critical part of your paper in which you analyze your interviewee’s experiences in relation to the research that you read about. Essentially what you do here is analyze how your interviewee experiences were typical or not typical – similar or different or a combination of the two – based on the results of articles you read (based on what you talked about in section C above). Give examples from the interview to defend your ideas. In this section, do not make the mistake of repeating what you said in section C – do not go into an in- depth discussion of the research articles; just make simple reference to them.
E. CONCLUSION AND REFLECTION (~1page): This section will contain three paragraphs, each covering the following:
1.Summarize what your paper covered (sections B, C, & D above, very briefly).
2.Reflect on what you learned about the topic from doing the project.
3.Reflect on what you learned about yourself as an interviewer. How difficult or easy was it for you to do
the interview? Why and did you build your interview skills
0 comments