• Home
  • Blog
  • Florida National University Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine Question

Florida National University Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine Question

0 comments

For this assignment, you will write an introduction. Refer to Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources to help you complete this assignment.

Your Introduction must include: Paper needs to be sent through turnitin ( free of plagiarism)

  • Your PICOT question.
  • Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:
    • Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).
  • Background on the problem or population of interest:
    • Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
    • Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.
  • Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:
    • State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
    • Create a context to why your topic is important.
  • Benefit of the project to nursing practice:
    • State what will be gained from your project.
    • Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
    • Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
    • Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.

Submission Instructions:

  • The introduction is original work and logically organized.
  • The paper is 2-3 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
  • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
    Essay/Paper Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Points
    Identification of Main Issues/Problems Distinguished – 4 points
    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
    Excellent – 3 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
    Fair – 2 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
    Poor – 1 point
    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
    4 points
    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems Distinguished – 4 points
    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
    Excellent – 3 points
    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
    Fair – 2 points
    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
    Poor – 1 point
    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
    4 points
    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding Distinguished – 4 points
    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
    Excellent – 3 points
    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
    Fair – 2 points
    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
    Poor – 1 point
    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
    4 points
    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature Distinguished – 4 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
    Excellent – 3 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
    Fair – 2 points
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
    Poor – 1 point
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
    4 points
    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Distinguished – 4 points
    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
    Excellent – 3 points
    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
    Fair – 2 points
    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
    Poor – 1 point
    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
    4 points
    Total Points 20

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}