Do Financial Managers Maximize Value?
Reduced effort
Perks
Empire building
- Entrenching investment
- Overinvestment
- Insufficient disinvestment
- Risk taking
- Corporate Governance
- Monitoring
- Incentives
Constraints
Monitoring: Can prevent the more obvious agency costs, with diminishing returns
- Board of Directors
- Require greater independence (e.g., Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
- Delegation of monitoring to the board brings agency problems
Auditors
The board is required to hire independent accountants to audit the firm’s financial statements
- Ensure consistency with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
Issue “qualified option”
- Lenders
- Bank tracks company’s assets, earnings and cash flow
Shareholders
- Activist investors
Take “Wall Street Walk”
- Takeovers.
- Monitored by other management teams
- Management Compensation
Described in Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
- Shareholders have say-on-pay vote
Concern about “excessive” pay
- Structure is more important than amount
Compensation Tied to Stock Performance
- Stock options
give managers the right to buy their company’s shares in the future at fixed exercise price
- Restricted shares
- manager receives a fixed number of shares at the end of a vesting period as long as he is still with the company
Performance shares
- manager receives shares of company stock; the number of shares is related to his or her performance in the interim
Issues?
- Force managers to bear risks outside their control
Encourage excessive risk taking
Tempted to withhold bad news or manage reported earnings, and etc.
”Tyranny of EPS” and short-sightedness of stock market
- Accounting profits
- Standard should be the opportunity cost for investment
- Economic Value Added (EVA)
- Bias in accounting measures
Agency Costs:
Business and market require trust to operate efficiently
All laws and regulations are costly
Governance and ethics failures have cost our economy billions if not trillions of dollars
Accounting Scandals
Misleading Research Reports
- Auditors: Watchdogs or Consultants?
Response to financial crisis?
- Solution?
Topic 9—Market Efficiency
- “Smart investment decisions create more value than smart financing decisions.”
- Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)
The hypothesis that prices of securities fully reflect available information about securities.
- Weak
Stock prices already reflect all information contained in the history of past trading.
- Semi-strong
Stock prices already reflect all publicly available information.
Strong
- Stock prices reflect all relevant information, including inside information.
Obstacles of Market Efficiency
- Information
Limits to arbitrage
- Behavioral bias
Behavioral Finance
- NOT process information correctly:
Overconfidence
Information overload
Forecasting errors
- Even they do, they make less-than-fully rational decisions (behavior biases)
Framing effect
Herding
Regret avoidance
- Disposition effect
- Active or Passive Management
Active Management
- Security analysis
Timing strategies
Investment Newsletters
- Passive Management
Buy and Hold portfolios
- Index Funds
Implications for Financial Managers
- If the Market Is Efficient
- Markets have no memory
- Trust market prices
- Read the entrails
- The do-it-yourself alternative
- Seen one stock, seen them all
If the Market Is NOT Efficient
What if the company’s shares are mispriced?
What if your firm is caught in a bubble?
Topic 10—Corporate Financing
Sources of Financing
Internal finance: profits that companies retain and reinvest
Sell new debt
- Sell new equity securities
Financing decisions:
Payout policy: What fraction of profits should be plowed back into the business rather than paid out to shareholders?
- Debt policy: What fraction of the financial deficit should be met with debt rather than equity?
Common Stock and Debt
Common Stock
- Cash-flow rights
residual claim
Control rights
- Complete control of the firm
stockholders’ control rights can be limited
Voting rights
Yes
- Bankruptcy
- Options stockholder have to default on the debt and gives away the cash-flow and control rights
- Dividends are paid from after-tax income
Debt
Cash-flow rights
- first claim on cash flows, but its claim is limited, risk is relatively low
Control rights
- no control rights unless firm defaults
- Voting rights
- No
Interest is paid from before-tax income (tax subsidy by government)
- Default risk
the likelihood that a firm will walk away from its obligation, either voluntarily or involuntarily.
- Financial Market and Intermediaries
- Recent Trends
- Globalization
Financial Engineering
Information and Computer Networks
- The Future?
Topic 11—Securities Markets
- Venture Capital
- Steps to obtaining venture funding:
- Prepare a business plan.
Receive first-stage financing.
- Receive subsequent staged financing.
Angel Investors
- Specialist venture-capital firms
- Corporate venturers
Crowdfunding
Two ways to cash in on their investment
Sold to a larger firm
- IPO
- How are securities issued?
- Primary Market
- New issue is created and sold
Issuer receives the proceeds from the sale
- IPO vs. seasoned equity offerings
Public offerings vs. private placement
Secondary Market
- Existing owner sells to another party
- Issuing firm doesn’t receive proceeds and is not directly involved
IPO:
Syndication
SEC approval: prospectus
- Firm commitment
- Underwriting vs. best-efforts
- IPO allocation, road shows
- Book and book building
Offered to the public
- IPO is expensive
- – IPO underpricing, averages about 10%
underwriting spread
Administrative costs
Short-term: underpricing on average
- Long-term: underperformance
General Cash Offer
- Sale of securities open to all investors by an already public company.
Shelf Registration: A procedure that allows firms to file one registration statement covering financing plans for up to three years in the future.
- It’s expensive
Direct costs
- Underpricing: offer price is lower than previous night’s close (average 3%)
- A decline in the stock price of 2%-4% follows the announcement of the issue (about 1/3 of new money raised by the issue!)
How are securities traded?:
- Dealer Markets (NASDAQ):
Dealer market is a market without centralized order flow
- Started as a quote system, introduced electronic trading platforms
Largest organized stock market for OTC trading; information system for individuals, brokers and dealers
- Securities: stocks, most bonds and some derivatives
No specialist, but 3 levels of subscribers Three listing options
- Exchange Markets
Auction markets are markets with centralized order flow
- Dealership function: can be competitive or assigned by the exchange (specialists)
Securities: stock, futures contracts, options, and to a lesser extent bonds
Examples: NYSE, ASE, CBOE, CME
- NYSE
Physical location
- There is a trading process and “seats”
Investors place orders with the brokerage firms
- The brokerage firm sends order to the floor of the exchange
Floor brokers take orders to the specialists
- The specialist s “cross” the trade
Topic 12—Payout Policy
- Payout Policy
Payout Options:
- Pay dividends
Repurchase shares
- The Information Content of Dividends and Repurchases
- Managers are reluctant to make dividend changes that might have to be reversed.
Managers “smooth” dividends and hate to cut them. Dividend changes follow shifts in long-run, sustainable levels of earnings.
- Managers focus more on dividend changes than on absolute dividend levels.
Payout Policy and Value of the Firm:
Does payout policy affect value in the long run?
Payout policy is irrelevant in perfect capital markets (without taxes, transaction costs, and other market imperfections)
Miller and Modigliani (MM) dividend-irrelevant theorem
Assume constant firm’s assets, investments and borrowing policy
- Current market capitalization not affected by payout policy
- Since investors do not need dividends to convert shares to cash, they will not pay higher prices for firms with higher dividend payouts. In other words, dividend policy will have no impact on the value of the firm.
- Other Considerations
- Market Imperfections and Clientele Effect
- Tax Consequences
If dividends are taxed more heavily than capital gains, firms should pay less dividends
Pension funds are not taxed
Corporations prefer cash dividends (pay corporate income tax on only 50% of dividends received, but pay 21% on realized capital gain)
How Much to Pay Out?
Payout change over the life cycle of the firm
- Questions for the Financial Manager
Is the company generating positive free cash flow after making all investments with positive NPVs, and is the positive free cash flow likely to continue?
- Is the firm’s debt ratio prudent?
Are the company’s holdings of cash a sufficient cushion for unexpected setbacks and a sufficient war chest for unexpected opportunities?
Topic 13—Debt Policy:
- Capital structure
A firm’s mix of debt and equity financing
- Financial leverage
Finance partially or wholly with debt
- Does debt policy matter?
- Market value of the firm
- Return and risk
- MM Proposition 1 and 2
Modigliani and Miller (MM) Proposition 1
- The market value of any firm is independent of its capital structure
- Perfect capital markets: Investors can borrow or lend on their own account on the same terms as the firm
There are no taxes
Debt policy does not affect firm’s investment and operating policies
- They can undo the effect of any changes in the firm’s capital structure
?Firm value is determined by real assets, not by the portions of debt and equity securities issued to buy the assets
- Modigliani and Miller (MM) Proposition 2
- The expected rate of return on the common stock of a levered firm increases in proportion to the debt-equity ratio (D/E)
- The rate of increase depends on the spread between
the expected rate of return on a portfolio of all the firm’s securities, and
the expected return on the debt
Modigliani and Miller (MM) Proposition 1 and 2
- D/E increases leads to increased financial risk, and higher return required by investors
Any increase in expected return is exactly offset by an increase in financial risk and therefore in shareholders’ required rate of return
- Leverage increases the expected earnings per share, but offset by a change in the rate at which the earnings are discounted ?share price doesn’t change
- ”There is no magic in financial leverage”
At higher debt levels, lenders become concerned that they many not get their money back, and demand higher rates of interest to compensate
- Holders of risky debt begin to bear part of the firm’s operating risk
- Expected return on assets does not change
- Corporate Tax
The interest is tax-deductible expense
- Since 2018, company can deduct up to 30% of EBITDA; from 2022, limit is 30% if EBIT
Value of firm=value if all-equity-financed + PV(tax shield)
- Assume fixed, permanent debt:
- Value of firm = value if all – equity – financed +
- After-tax WACC
WACC declines as debt increases
Cost of Financial Distress:
Value of firm = value if all – equity – financed + PV(tax shield ) – PV (costs of financial distress)
- Trade-off theory of capital structure
- The theoretical optimum is reached when the PV of tax savings due to further borrowing is just offset by increases in the PV of costs of distress
Companies with safe, tangible assets and plenty of taxable income to shield–>high debt ratios
- Unprofitable companies with risky, intangible assets–>low debt ratio
Bankruptcy costs
Increased leverage increases probability of default and the value of the lawyer’s claim, thus reduces present market value.
- Cost of bankruptcy comes out of shareholders’ pockets and creditors demand a higher promised interest rate.
- Financial distress without bankruptcy
- Conflict of interests between bondholders and stockholders
Cost of distress vary by type of asset
- the losses are greater for the intangible assets linked to the health of the firm as a going concern
- Peking Order
Asymmetry information—managers know more than outside investors
Implications
Firms prefer internal finance.
- Adapt target dividend payout ratios to investment opportunities while avoiding changes in dividends.
- Internally generated cash flow is sometimes more than capital expenditures, other times not.
- If more, firm pays off debt or invests in marketable securities.
- If less, firm first draws down cash balance or sells holdings of marketable securities.
- If external finance is required, firms issue the safest security first.
Issue equity when the threat of costs of financial distress is high
Topic 14—Valuation and Financing
- Net Present Value (NPV)
Invest in projects with NPV>0
- Steps:
- Forecast cash
- Determine the appropriate opportunity cost of capital (r)
Discount the project’s future cash flows
Calculate NPV:
- Extend it to include value contributed by financing decisions
- Adjust the discount rate
Adjust the present value
- Adjust Discount Rate
- Step 1: Forecast Cash Flow
- Free Cash Flow (FCF)
- The amount of cash that the firm can pay out to investors after making all investments necessary for growth
Calculated assuming the firm is all-equity-financed
Free cash flow and net income are different
calculated before interest
don’t deduct depreciation
- include capital expenditures and investments
- FCF = Profit after tax + depreciation – investment in fixed assets – investment in working capital.
Step 2. Adjust the Discount Rate
After-Tax Weighted-Average Cost of Capital
- discount rate for the “average” project
firm’s business risk and debt ratio are expected to remain constant
- The value of interest tax shields is picked up in the WACC formula.
Step 3 and 4: Valuing A Businesses or Project
Using WACC in Practice
When there are more than two sources of financing
+
, V=D+P+E, p is the amount of preferred stock
- Use company or industry WACC?
What if debt ratios and business risks differ?
- Adjusting WACC When Debt Ratios and Business Risks Differ
- Step 1 – Calculate the opportunity cost of capital, unlevering the WACC
- Step 2 – Estimate the cost of debt at the new debt ratio, and calculate the new cost of equity
Step 3 – Recalculate the weighted-average cost of capital at the new financing weights.
Unlevering and Relevering Betas
Step 1 – Unlever beta.
Step 2 – Estimate the betas of the debt and equity at the new debt ratio.
Step 3 – Recalculate the cost of equity and the WACC at the new financing weights.
- Companies must rebalance their capital structure to maintain the same market-value debt ratio for the relevant future.
- The firm has a 40% debt. Its cost of debt is 6% and the cost of equity is 12.5%.
What’s the WACC if the project of the firm supports only 20% of debt, assume cost of debt remains the same?
Approach A:
- 1. r = 0.06(.4) + .125(.6) = .099
- 2. rE = .099 + (.099 ? .06)(.25) = .109
- 3. WACC = .06(1 ? .21)(.2) + .109(.8) = .097, or 9.7%
Approach B:
+(
–
WACC =0.06*(1-21%)*0.2+0.8*0.109=0.097 , or 9.7%
- Adjust Present Value
- Adjusted present value (APV)
- explore the implications of different financing strategies without locking into a fixed debt ratio
check if the project can be reduced by an alternative financing plan
pick up other financing side effects besides interest tax shield
- Step 1: Calculate base-case NPV
All-equity-financed firm NPV, discount rate is opportunity cost of capital
- Step 2: calculate present value of financing side effects
all costs/benefits directly resulting from project
- Step 3:
APV = base-case NPV + sum of PVs of financing side effects.
- Sangria is a U.S.-based company whose products aim to promote happy, low-stress lifestyles.
The book and market-value balance sheet and other financial data for Sangria are listed below.
- Sangria Corporation (Book Values, $ millions)
- Sangria Corporation (Market Values, $ millions)
Sangria’s enologists have proposed investing $12.5 million in the construction of a perpetual crushing machine, which never depreciates and generates a perpetual stream earnings and cash flow of $1.487 million per year pretax. The project is average risk, so we can use WACC of Sangria. The after-tax cash flow taking no account of interest tax shields on debt supported by the perpetual crusher project is listed blow:
Pre tax cash flow. $1.487 million
Tax at 21% $ 0.312 million After-tax cash flow $1.175 million
(a). Calculate the NPV of the project.
- WACC=0.06*(1-21%)*0.4+0.125*0.6=9.4%
- NPV=-12.5+1.175/9.4%=0
- (b). What are the assumptions you make when you discount the perpetual crusher’s cash flows at Sangria’s WACC?
- 1.The project’s business risks are the same as those of Sangria’s other assets and remain so for the life of the project;
2. Throughout its life, the project supports the same fraction of debt to value as in Sangria’s overall capital structure.
(c). If Sangria’s perpetual crusher project supports only 20% debt, instead of 40% for Sangria overall, how are you going to adjust the discount rate? Step 1: r = 0.06(.4) + .125(.6) = .099, or 9.9%
Step 2: rE = .099 + (.099 ? .06)(.25) = .109, or 10.9%
Step 3: WACC = .06(1 ? .21)(.2) + .109(.8) = .097, or 9.7%
(d). Calculate the project NPV using APV approach assuming the debt ratio will remain at 40% throughout the life of the project.
- Opportunity cost of capital: r = 0.06(.4) + .125(.6) = .099, or 9.9%
- Base-case NPV=-12.5+1.175/9.9%=-$0.63 million
Interest tax shield every year=12.5*0.4*0.21*6%=0.063 million
PV (interest tax shields)=0.063/9.9%=0.63 million
APV=-0.63 million +0.63 million=0
(e). Sangria has to finance the perpetual crusher by issuing debt and equity. It issues $7.5 million of equity with issue costs of 7% (0.53 million) and $ 5 million of debt with issue costs of 2% (0.1 million). Assume the debt is fixed once issued. What’s APV?
PV (interest rate)=0.063/6%=$ 1.05 million
- APV=-0.63+1.05-0.53-0,1=-$0.21 million
- The expected rate of return on the common stock of an unlevered firm is 10%. The expected return on debt is 5.5%. According to MM Proposition 2, what’s the expected rate of return on the common stock of a levered firm if the market value of debt is $200,000 and market value of equity is $500,000. Please show all your work to derive the final answer to get full credit.
- rA = rE of unlvered firm=10% rE=10%+(10%-5.5%)*200000/500000=11.8%
The market-value balance sheet and other financial data for Company XXX are listed below.
Asset value
$1,200,000 Debt
$300,000
Equity
$900,000
$1,200,000
$1,200,000
Cost of debt 5%
- Cost of equity 12.5% Marginal tax rate 21%
The financial manager of company XXX is considering a project that requires $50,000 investment today and expects to generate a perpetual earnings and cash flow of $5,000 each year (pretax). Assume no depreciation. However, the project supports only 35% debt, which is different from the debt ratio of company XXX overall. Calculate NPV of the project by adjusting WACC of the project. (keep four decimals including percentage to avoid rounding error).
- r=5%*300000/1200000+12.5%*900000/1200000=10.625%
- rE=10.625%+(10.625%-5%)*0.35/0.65=13.6538%
WACC=5%*(1-21%)*0.35+13.6538%*0.65=10.2575%
NPV=-50000+3950/10.2575%=-11491.5915
3. You will use APV method to calculate the value of company YYY (keep four decimals). Show are your inputs to get full credit.
(a). What’s profit after tax in year 3? Show your inputs to get full credit. (73000-46080-4500)*(1-21%)=17712
(b). What’s free cash flow in year 2? Show your inputs to get full credit. 17712+4500-(10429-10286)-(75000-70000)=17069
(c). What’s after-tax WACC and cost of capital of company XXX?
After-tax WACC=5%*(1-21%)*25%+12.5%*75%=10.3625% Cost of capital= 5%*25%+12.5%*75%=10.625%
- (d). What’s horizon value (not the present value)?
- 5495/(10.3625%-4%)=86365.4224
- (e). What’s the base-case PV of company? What’s the PV of interest tax shields? What’s the PV of company YYY?
Base-case PV of company = 7021/(1+10.625%)+7177/(1+10.625%)2+17069/(1+10.625%)3+86365.4224/(1+10.625%)3=88613.1823
- PV(interest tax shield)= 30000*5%*0.21//(1+5%)+28000*5%*0.21/(1+5%)2+25000*5%*0.21/(1+5%)3=793.424
Pv (company)= 88613.1823 +793.424=89406.6063


0 comments