I’m making a video for this assignment, so I just need to answer the questions below so i can read it during the video. PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC BUT KEEP IT SIMPLE PLEASE! THIS ASSIGNMENT IS MEANT FOR SOMEONE WHO DOESN’T SPEAK GOOD ENGLISH, SO KEEP IT SIMPLE.
Answer all the questions below.
- Why do you think the financial system has become more globally integrated over time? Can you think of any downside to this increased integration? (LO1)
2. As the end of the month approaches, you realize that you probably will not be able to pay the next month’s rent. Describe both an informal and a formal financial instrument that you might use to solve your dilemma. (LO1)
3. While we often associate informal financial arrangements with poorer countries where financial systems are less developed, informal arrangements often coexist within the most developed financial systems. What advantages might there be to engaging in informal arrangements rather than utilizing the formal financial sector? (LO1)
Grading Rubric for Individual Presentations
Presentation #1: 100% value = ____ points
|
Introduction 10% |
% of Points Available 10 |
% of Points Earned |
Additional Comments: |
|
· 10.0 to >9.0 pts Excellent · Gains the attention of the viewer, States Thesis, establishes credibility, Previews main points · 9.0 to >8.0 pts Good · Meets any three of four criteria · 8.0 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement · Meets any two of four criteria · 7.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements · Meets only one of the four criteria Meets none of the criteria |
% |
||
|
Organization 20% |
% of Points Available 20 |
% of Points Earned |
Additional Comments: |
|
· 20.0 to >18.0 pts Excellent · Creative and comprehensive organizational pattern. Consistently maintained and enhanced cohesiveness of speech. Multiple occurrences of internal and comprehensive transitions. · 18.0 to >16.0 pts Good · Good use of organizational patterns. Usually maintained and contributed to cohesiveness of speech. A couple of occurrences of awkward internal and comprehensive transitions. · 16.0 to >14.0 pts Needs Improvement · Attempted to use an organizational pattern. You tried to maintain and add to the cohesiveness of speech. Some occurrences of internal and comprehensive transitions. · 14.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements · Speech lacked organization and cohesiveness overall. Did not use any internal transitions or basic signposts, “next, second” transitional words. Incoherence; poor organization and transition. |
% |
||
|
Content 40% |
% of Points Available 40 |
% of Points Earned |
Additional Comments: |
|
· 40.0 to >36.0 pts Excellent · Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. When visual aids are used, they are easy to interpret. · 36.0 to >32.0 pts Good · Some significant but not major errors or omissions in the demonstration of knowledge. Though visual aids are used, some are difficult to interpret. · 32.0 to >28.0 pts Needs Improvement · Major errors or omissions in the demonstration of knowledge. Though visual aids are used, most are difficult to interpret. · 28.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements · Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. No knowledge of the material |
% |
||
|
Delivery 20% |
% of Points Available 20 |
% of Points Earned |
Additional Comments: |
|
· 20.0 to >18.0 pts Excellent · Exhibited confidence. Expressed vocal variety. Engaging gestures, facial expressions, and appearance greatly enhanced the message. Minimal nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera virtually all the time (except for glances at notes). · 18.0 to >16.0 pts Good · Confidence is usually apparent. Usually displayed vocal variety. Good use of gestures, facial expressions, and appearance was appropriate. Some nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera most of the time. · 16.0 to >14.0 pts Needs Improvement · Appears somewhat confident. Natural vocal variety but lacked expressive emphasis; Adequate gestures and facial expressions; appearance was satisfactory. Several nervous mannerisms. Eye contact with the audience or the camera less than 50% of the time. · 14.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements · Lacked confidence. Ineffective vocal delivery. Futile gestures and facial expressions; inappropriate or distracting appearance. Continual nervous mannerisms, vocal fillers, and distracting movement. Little or no eye contact with the audience or the camera. Ineffective delivery. |
% |
||
|
Conclusion 10% |
% of Points Available 10 |
% of Points Earned |
Additional Comments: |
|
· 10.0 to >9.0 pts Excellent · Cues viewer that the end of the speech is at hand. Brings closure. Restates the main points of the presentation. Memorable. · 9.0 to >8.0 pts Good · Attempts to cue viewer and brings closure, but not effectively. · 8.0 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement · Attempts to bring closure, but does not restate or leave an impression. · 7.0 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements · It does not bring closure; the audience is left hanging. It does not bring closure; the viewer is left hanging. |
% |
. |
|
|
· |
|||
|
Grammar grade: % Plagiarism: 0% |
Total Available |
Total Earned |
xx/100 |
Final Grades: See Gradebook after the last post online.
Oral Presentation Feedback
|
Date: Spring 2021 |
||
|
Student: |
||
|
Course: BUSA 1313 |
||
|
Assignment: Visual Presentation |
||
|
Presentation: 100% (x Points) Paper Content: 0% |
||
|
Introduction |
||
|
Circle One |
Comments |
|
|
Was the speaker in position at the start? |
Yes No |
|
|
Is the speaker’s appearance appropriate? |
Yes No |
|
|
Did the speaker introduce him/herself? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was there an “attention, getter?” |
Yes No |
|
|
Did the speaker give a good preview? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was there an excellent transition to the body? |
Yes No |
|
|
Organization/Structure |
||
|
Did the speaker appear confident and at ease? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was the presentation well organized, clear, and effectively structured? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was eye contact made with the audience throughout the speech? |
Yes No |
|
|
Did they use appropriate gestures? |
Yes No |
|
|
Did they control excessive hand movement? |
Yes No |
|
|
Did the team maintain good posture and not lean? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was there minimal use of “non-words?” |
Yes No |
|
|
Was body language open and non-threatening? |
Yes No |
|
|
Did the speaker read from written notes or paper? |
Yes No |
|
|
Were there transitions between speakers? |
Yes No |
|
|
Conclusion |
||
|
Speaker presented a clear summary. |
Yes No |
|
|
Group solicited questions and answered them thoroughly. |
Yes No |
|
|
Visual Aids (VA) |
||
|
VAs were appropriate to the content. |
Yes No |
|
|
VAs were clear, concise, and uncluttered. |
Yes No |
|
|
Content |
||
|
Did the content followed written directions? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was the topic relevant and address the assignment? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was the content presented comprehensively and accurately? |
Yes No |
|
|
Was the topic researched adequately? |
Yes No |
|


0 comments