|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1.1: reached the right conclusion
|
| 0.5 pts
Full Marks
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
0.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically whether the intervention effort by the Thai government constitute direct or indirect intervention.
|
| 1 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
0.75 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.25 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2.1: reached the right conclusion
|
| 0.5 pts
Full Marks
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
0.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically the intervention by the Thai government constitute sterilized or nonsterilized intervention and the difference between the types of intervention
|
| 1 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
0.75 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.25 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3.1: reached the right conclusion
|
| 0.5 pts
Full Marks
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
0.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3.2: DiscussionExplained correctly and logically which type of government intervention (sterilized vs. nonsterilized) would be more effective in increasing the value of the baht
|
| 1 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
0.75 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.25 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ4.1: reached the right conclusion
|
| 0.5 pts
Full Marks
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
0.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ4.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically what would happen to the U.S. levels of inflation, if the Thai baht is virtually fixed with respect to the dollar
|
| 1.5 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
1 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.75 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.3 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ5: DiscussionDiscuss the potential disadvantages for Thai levels of inflation associated with the floating exchange rate system that is now used in Thailand
|
| 1.5 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
1 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.75 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.3 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ6: DiscussionDiscuss what will happen to the Thai baht’s value when the swap arrangement is reversed later
|
| 1 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
0.67 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.2 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ7: DiscussionSuggestions to Mr. Holt with regard to Blades’ business in this circumstance
|
| 1 pts
Exemplary
Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material
|
0.67 pts
Highly Acceptable
Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material
|
0.5 pts
Acceptable
Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used
|
0.2 pts
Somewhat Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence
|
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used
|
|
1 pts
|
|
Total Points: 10
|
0 comments